No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum ~ Live Chat

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: M44's [Re: alaska viking] #8610394
Yesterday at 02:21 PM
Yesterday at 02:21 PM
Joined: Mar 2010
SD
Boone Liane Offline
trapper
Boone Liane  Offline
trapper

Joined: Mar 2010
SD
Originally Posted by alaska viking
I first heard about these things back in the 1970s and thought of how in-discriminate they must be.


Quite the opposite actually.

Re: M44's [Re: alaska viking] #8610458
Yesterday at 05:52 PM
Yesterday at 05:52 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
SD
T
Tray Offline
"Wilson Jr."
Tray  Offline
"Wilson Jr."
T

Joined: Feb 2010
SD
Originally Posted by alaska viking
It is a terrible idea. I first heard about these things back in the 1970s and thought of how in-discriminate they must be. And I still think that. Many non-target animals that we, as trappers, try to avoid were, and would be, killed un-intentionally. I know that myself, as well as pretty much every trapper I know go out of our way to be discriminant with our sets, even refusing sets that just might catch un-intended critters.
The M-44 is obviously a lethal "set" and can be "set off" by many different animals, including raptors, any canine, cats, humans, etc. And the idea that this would be ok on public land is idiocy.



It’s the most selective tool I use outside of a rifle, killed several thousand coyotes with them and only 1 coon and 1
Skunk. Heck I’ve killed more non targets with my truck driving to check equipment most weeks then I have in 28 years of running M-44s.

Re: M44's [Re: Bdaniel] #8610501
Yesterday at 07:47 PM
Yesterday at 07:47 PM
Joined: May 2010
idaho
W
wallfur Offline
trapper
wallfur  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: May 2010
idaho
yes very effictive tool but needs to be set accordingly to be selective. back when i worked usda-adc here in idaho i had one certain spot on private land for smaller flock of sheep. after looking over the area i choose not to use legholds or m-44s...set snares and calling instead. this property was to close to to house of another neighbor land...long story short a few years ago another adc trapper set m44 on the property line between the 2 places and ended up killing a black lab and putting a young boy in the hospital. the general public dont decipher between the tools used for trapping they just know it was a trapper that done it. gives all trappers a black eye. we have alot of hounds hunters here and hounds have been killed aciedently staying on to private land. so i dont think m44s have anyplace or need to be set on public land...the best tool for taking alot coyotes is by flying it. as m44s will kill alot of non target fox and a few bobcats.

Page 2 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread