No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum ~ Live Chat

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: M44's [Re: alaska viking] #8610394
05/10/26 02:21 PM
05/10/26 02:21 PM
Joined: Mar 2010
SD
Boone Liane Offline
trapper
Boone Liane  Offline
trapper

Joined: Mar 2010
SD
Originally Posted by alaska viking
I first heard about these things back in the 1970s and thought of how in-discriminate they must be.


Quite the opposite actually.

Re: M44's [Re: alaska viking] #8610458
05/10/26 05:52 PM
05/10/26 05:52 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
SD
T
Tray Offline
"Wilson Jr."
Tray  Offline
"Wilson Jr."
T

Joined: Feb 2010
SD
Originally Posted by alaska viking
It is a terrible idea. I first heard about these things back in the 1970s and thought of how in-discriminate they must be. And I still think that. Many non-target animals that we, as trappers, try to avoid were, and would be, killed un-intentionally. I know that myself, as well as pretty much every trapper I know go out of our way to be discriminant with our sets, even refusing sets that just might catch un-intended critters.
The M-44 is obviously a lethal "set" and can be "set off" by many different animals, including raptors, any canine, cats, humans, etc. And the idea that this would be ok on public land is idiocy.



It’s the most selective tool I use outside of a rifle, killed several thousand coyotes with them and only 1 coon and 1
Skunk. Heck I’ve killed more non targets with my truck driving to check equipment most weeks then I have in 28 years of running M-44s.

Re: M44's [Re: Bdaniel] #8610501
05/10/26 07:47 PM
05/10/26 07:47 PM
Joined: May 2010
idaho
W
wallfur Offline
trapper
wallfur  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: May 2010
idaho
yes very effictive tool but needs to be set accordingly to be selective. back when i worked usda-adc here in idaho i had one certain spot on private land for smaller flock of sheep. after looking over the area i choose not to use legholds or m-44s...set snares and calling instead. this property was to close to to house of another neighbor land...long story short a few years ago another adc trapper set m44 on the property line between the 2 places and ended up killing a black lab and putting a young boy in the hospital. the general public dont decipher between the tools used for trapping they just know it was a trapper that done it. gives all trappers a black eye. we have alot of hounds hunters here and hounds have been killed aciedently staying on to private land. so i dont think m44s have anyplace or need to be set on public land...the best tool for taking alot coyotes is by flying it. as m44s will kill alot of non target fox and a few bobcats.

Re: M44's [Re: Bdaniel] #8611438
Yesterday at 07:16 PM
Yesterday at 07:16 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Idaho
I
Idahotrapguy Offline
trapper
Idahotrapguy  Offline
trapper
I

Joined: Nov 2010
Idaho
Bob, Idaho still is not using them because of the one incident in Eastern Idaho. Wasn't sure of legality just know that supervisor of Wildlife Services here in Idaho is not allowing his guys to use them.


Life member of ITA, NTA, NRA and 13 other trapping organizations. President of the Idaho Trappers Association and the National Trappers Association
Re: M44's [Re: Bdaniel] #8611460
Yesterday at 08:24 PM
Yesterday at 08:24 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
ND
M
MJM Offline
trapper
MJM  Offline
trapper
M

Joined: Dec 2006
ND
Like any of the tools used, some times you have to use a little common sense on where you set them, private or public land. Should you be able to use any lethal on public ground? To me a body grip is no different in the end results. Just because it is legal doesn't mean it is a good idea, no matter what you are setting or using. Most problems come from people not using their head and thinking about what can happen.


"Not Really, Not Really"
Mark J Monti
"MJM you're a jerk."
Re: M44's [Re: Bdaniel] #8611591
5 hours ago
5 hours ago
Joined: Dec 2006
Northern Illinois
M
MChewk Offline
trapper
MChewk  Offline
trapper
M

Joined: Dec 2006
Northern Illinois
Good points Mark. Common sense prevails.
Off topic a bit but it relates to the post. Here in Illinois, we can't use snares on dry land....just half in half out of the water. I can't tell you how many times I've been limited by that rule while trying to remove problem beaver.
Let trappers get the job with ALL of the tools available!

Re: M44's [Re: Bdaniel] #8611704
1 hour ago
1 hour ago
Joined: Mar 2011
Oregon
S
ScottPhillips Offline
trapper
ScottPhillips  Offline
trapper
S

Joined: Mar 2011
Oregon
Like I said before, the lack of education shines in comments on here from "trappers".


See Us on Facebook: Northwestpredatorandwildlifecontrol

Re: M44's [Re: Bdaniel] #8611706
1 hour ago
1 hour ago
Joined: Apr 2020
New Mexico
C
coytrpr Offline
trapper
coytrpr  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Apr 2020
New Mexico
I agree with Scott. Too many comments on this thread sound like anti-trapper comments about traps.

Page 2 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread