Re: Trump Willing To Consider Suppressor Ban
[Re: Steven 49er]
#6551970
06/09/19 10:06 AM
06/09/19 10:06 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,683 PA
gryhkl
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,683
PA
|
Grykhk, your last sentence is false and it's not a matter of need Are you saying the silencer/suppressor is an arem protected under the constitution? I don't believe they are and we are better off worrying about the things that are.
|
|
|
Re: Trump Willing To Consider Suppressor Ban
[Re: BillyTraps]
#6551980
06/09/19 10:15 AM
06/09/19 10:15 AM
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 10,490 MN
Steven 49er
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 10,490
MN
|
Yes I do and no I don't own one
"Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon". Milton Friedman.
|
|
|
Re: Trump Willing To Consider Suppressor Ban
[Re: gryhkl]
#6551993
06/09/19 10:29 AM
06/09/19 10:29 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 4,771 Beatrice, NE
loosegoose
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 4,771
Beatrice, NE
|
Grykhk, your last sentence is false and it's not a matter of need Are you saying the silencer/suppressor is an arem protected under the constitution? I don't believe they are and we are better off worrying about the things that are. Magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, removable magazines, collapsible stocks, scopes, red dot sights, pistol grips, vertical foregrips, barrel shrouds, flash suppressors, etc etc aren't "arms" either, so don't worry if they get banned too? Some things are worth fighting for, so that we're not limited to cap and ball revolvers some day.
|
|
|
Re: Trump Willing To Consider Suppressor Ban
[Re: gryhkl]
#6552064
06/09/19 12:48 PM
06/09/19 12:48 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 10,404 Northeast Oklahoma
Mike in A-town
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 10,404
Northeast Oklahoma
|
Grykhk, your last sentence is false and it's not a matter of need Are you saying the silencer/suppressor is an arem protected under the constitution? I don't believe they are and we are better off worrying about the things that are. This statement is a perfect example of why liberty is disappearing. A lot of people know what is written in the Constitution, but lack (or refuse to use) the critical thinking skills about what those words actually mean. Repeat after me... "The 2nd Amendment restricts the government, not the citizenry." Keep repeating until the idea is firmly rooted. Mike
One man with a gun may control 100 others who have none.
Vladimir Lenin
|
|
|
Re: Trump Willing To Consider Suppressor Ban
[Re: BillyTraps]
#6552065
06/09/19 12:51 PM
06/09/19 12:51 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,619 N. Carolina
Scout1
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,619
N. Carolina
|
I wish suppressor had been more available in the years past. Maybe I wouldn't have permanent ringing in my ears.
------------------------------------- DJT & MTG in 2024!
|
|
|
Re: Trump Willing To Consider Suppressor Ban
[Re: Mike in A-town]
#6552095
06/09/19 02:21 PM
06/09/19 02:21 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 11,269 Indiana
brianmall
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 11,269
Indiana
|
Are you saying the silencer/suppressor is an arem protected under the constitution? I don't believe they are and we are better off worrying about the things that are.
This statement is a perfect example of why liberty is disappearing. A lot of people know what is written in the Constitution, but lack (or refuse to use) the critical thinking skills about what those words actually mean. Repeat after me... "The 2nd Amendmentwhole Constitution restricts the government, not the citizenry." Keep repeating until the idea is firmly rooted. Mike [/quote] Not to disagree with you! Just wanted to expand on your fact!
|
|
|
Re: Trump Willing To Consider Suppressor Ban
[Re: gryhkl]
#6552415
06/09/19 11:17 PM
06/09/19 11:17 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 16,150 Tennessee
Scuba1
"color blind Kraut"
|
"color blind Kraut"
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 16,150
Tennessee
|
Are you saying the silencer/suppressor is an arem protected under the constitution? I don't believe they are and we are better off worrying about the things that are.
gryhkl ..... Lets start with a simple thing. Google or grab a dictionary and try to figure out what " shall not be infringed " means. I don't have the time or the crayons to explain it to you.
Last edited by Scuba1; 06/09/19 11:29 PM.
Let's go Brandon
"Shall not comply" with morons who don't understand "shall not infringe."
|
|
|
Re: Trump Willing To Consider Suppressor Ban
[Re: BillyTraps]
#6552416
06/09/19 11:21 PM
06/09/19 11:21 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 16,150 Tennessee
Scuba1
"color blind Kraut"
|
"color blind Kraut"
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 16,150
Tennessee
|
On another note. I got an email from the SC conservative party asking for donations with Trumps birthday coming up blank bla bla........ I told them that once they teach the guy what shallop not be infringed means I will only be to happy to resume with donations. Till then that tap stays shut and they will have to look for any form of support elsewhere. I do not give my money or support to people or organizations, that throw the rights of the people away. Maybe he does not want a second term. I mean ya can't blame the guy with having to look after the greatest nut house on the continent with a bunch of senile and some vicious crackpots in there.
Last edited by Scuba1; 06/09/19 11:23 PM.
Let's go Brandon
"Shall not comply" with morons who don't understand "shall not infringe."
|
|
|
Re: Trump Willing To Consider Suppressor Ban
[Re: BillyTraps]
#6552462
06/10/19 05:26 AM
06/10/19 05:26 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,379 Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
James
"Minka"
|
"Minka"
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,379
Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
|
The main body of the Constitution creates and empowers government.
It's the Bill of Rights and subsequent amendments that restrict government.
Jim
Forum Infidel since 2001
"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
|
|
|
Re: Trump Willing To Consider Suppressor Ban
[Re: BillyTraps]
#6552463
06/10/19 05:29 AM
06/10/19 05:29 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,379 Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
James
"Minka"
|
"Minka"
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,379
Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
|
Suppressors aren't in common use, and are not directly "arms," so may not be covered under the Second Amendment. We wouldn't know unless a court rules in an appropriate case.
Jim
Forum Infidel since 2001
"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
|
|
|
Re: Trump Willing To Consider Suppressor Ban
[Re: BillyTraps]
#6552464
06/10/19 05:33 AM
06/10/19 05:33 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 29,894 williamsburg ks
danny clifton
"Grumpy Old Man"
|
"Grumpy Old Man"
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 29,894
williamsburg ks
|
James they ARE legal under KS law. Right now. However unlike marijuana in Colorado the feds will prosecute. They don't prosecute for marijuana because Donny told them not to. He sure has not said that when gun law conflicts with state law.
Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
|
|
|
Re: Trump Willing To Consider Suppressor Ban
[Re: James]
#6552494
06/10/19 07:23 AM
06/10/19 07:23 AM
|
J Staton
Unregistered
|
J Staton
Unregistered
|
Suppressors aren't in common use, and are not directly "arms," so may not be covered under the Second Amendment. We wouldn't know unless a court rules in an appropriate case.
Jim That's the angle I figure anti-2nd proponents will use. Suppresors are not necessary to the function of the firearm. I don't agree with it at all. However, with today's legislating from the bench, Robert's Obamacare decision as an example, it would not surprise me if such a ban was upheld.
|
|
|
|
|