No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter
So a local Fresh Mark plant by me got raided yesterday and they hauled out over 100 workers for being illegals. My son said he had to deliver parts to a Case Farms plant that is close to there as well and he said there's hardly anybody there that even speaks English. There are two other Fresh Mark plants close by that are being targeted as well. These illegals are now gonna be separated from their spouses and kids. Whats everyones thoughts? My wife and I argue that its terrible they are getting separated and deported. I say they came here illegally, bought fake ID's, knowingly broke the law and it also opens up over 100 jobs for Americans here? I also told her does she feel bad for the guy that robs a convenience store and goes to jail even though he has 2 (or 20) kids at home that he's being separated from, she says no that's different. Sorry, no its not.
"The more people I meet the more I love my dog!"
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6263484 06/20/1808:39 AM06/20/1808:39 AM
Businesses that knowingly hire illegals should be have all of their assets seized and auctioned off, why do we only/mostly target illegals and not the businesses that employ them? This would end immigration problems nearly immediately.
Businesses that knowingly hire illegals should be have all of their assets seized and auctioned off, why do we only/mostly target illegals and not the businesses that employ them? This would end immigration problems nearly immediately.
this! Democrats are to blame for the separation of families. They are the enablers. And when bad situations like this happen, they're going to point the finger at Trump. LOL! If they weren't such a dangerous threat to democracy they would be hilarious.
"Nothing I like to do pays well." True Grit
"Revenge is in the hands of God, not mine." Revenant.
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6263521 06/20/1809:11 AM06/20/1809:11 AM
i dont feel bad for me personally. like said they knew what they were doin and what theyve been doin. apparently all of em never expected anything to happen either. glad to see a bit a change
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6263530 06/20/1809:20 AM06/20/1809:20 AM
we should be harder on the businesses , but for what ever reason don't. one would suspect because many businesses using illegal labor have some pull at the state and federal level.
it should be hard on them now with no labor and lots of work to get done and 3% unemployment.
large portions of our industry has depended on Illegal labor for decades , there does need to be a way for them to get legal labor but you and I know that it is about the bottom line and securing visas costs money and takes time. Hiring legal labor you have to provide a decent wage and follow safety protocols and provide some benefits.
as for separating kids from their families , I have been thinking on that , My wife is also very upset about this , yeah they know just how to tug at their heart strings with these media reports and they are not as desensitized to the media sensationalism.
some questions I had
what did they do 2-3 years ago and how is this different or is it just greater number because of increased enforcement?
one thing my wife said was this includes people who brought their families to the border and asked for asylum. how was that handled 2-3 years ago?
these bussinesses claim that they need them. I am not so sure they need them it is clear that businesses use these people as labor but they also use them up.
you can't be all about rights if you still treat people as if they are disposable wear them out and let them go no care taken to reduce long term injury just disposable people.
so it is clear that disposable humans make for a lower cost of labor.
We clearly have issues on both sides of this mess.
enforcement is clearly very expensive also.
I think that congress should offer a one year exit amnesty program coupled with a registration period say Jan 1 to DEC 31, 2019 at the same time if they have a company that wants to sponsor them and they register and have no outstanding criminal issues then 5 year visa should be awarded with the requirement that the company post a 10k bond for that person after all they were here illegally and should they break the terms of the visa the bond will help with their capture in an immigration warrant either they are invaluable to you as an employer or they are not a bond helps with the fact that you were hiring them illegally and they were here illegally . nothing goes so smooth as people doing something voluntarily even if you had to set conditions so that they would want to volunteer.
Last edited by GREENCOUNTYPETE; 06/20/1809:39 AM.
America only has one issue, we have a Responsibility crisis and everything else stems from it.
Businesses that knowingly hire illegals should be have all of their assets seized and auctioned off, why do we only/mostly target illegals and not the businesses that employ them? This would end immigration problems nearly immediately.
I agree, however I am not sure they know if they have the proper (albiet fake) paperwork. I think companies can play dumb?
"The more people I meet the more I love my dog!"
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6263550 06/20/1809:38 AM06/20/1809:38 AM
Most illegal, Hispanic workers are men, who if they even have families, leave their families, back in their home countries. They mostly live in crowded rental houses, full of other illegal alien men. They send much of the money they make back to their home countries.
The media is promoting the tremendous lie that it is mostly families being caught entering the US. It's mostly single men and older teenage boys, invading our country to find work.
Businesses that knowingly hire illegals should be have all of their assets seized and auctioned off, why do we only/mostly target illegals and not the businesses that employ them? This would end immigration problems nearly immediately.
The key word is "knowingly"... you need to prove that the business KNEW that the person had fake documents, and then still hired them anyhow....
If they have a SS#, a state ID that match, then what? I am unaware of a database that a company can use to search and see if the ss# matches the name. so when they type it in, Jesus Espenoza's SS# doesn't match Doris McGinny that the ss# belongs to....
Perhaps that would be the solution.....everytime anyone gets a job, they get a background check like a 4473, to make sure everything matches... But, thats just more government.... and we all know what more government creates......Problems....
and calls to seize the business and assets? what is this, Venezuela? and you'd be in favor of putting all the Americans working there out of jobs, because the company unknowingly hired 20 illegals to pluck chicken feathers?
Businesses that knowingly hire illegals should be have all of their assets seized and auctioned off, why do we only/mostly target illegals and not the businesses that employ them? This would end immigration problems nearly immediately.
The key word is "knowingly"... you need to prove that the business KNEW that the person had fake documents, and then still hired them anyhow....
If they have a SS#, a state ID that match, then what? I am unaware of a database that a company can use to search and see if the ss# matches the name. so when they type it in, Jesus Espenoza's SS# doesn't match Doris McGinny that the ss# belongs to.... ?
I believe this will all hit a head sooner than later. It could get mighty ugly.
It's ALREADY Been Ugly For A Long Time, Martin !!!
w
No really, conservatives did not get ugly thru 8 years of bo. They did nothing like what the libs are doing now and it will escalate daily. Its more OK to berate a white man than a black man. That's the new equality.
E 'Honey Badger Militia' Sleep, the anti woke adote.
The packing plants here always got a heads up the day before on the raids the places were about 1/2 empty on raid day! Someone was getting a fat envelope someplace!
Was born in a Big City Will die in the Country OK with that!
Jerry Herbst
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6264143 06/21/1806:38 AM06/21/1806:38 AM
If a American breaks the law they go to jail separated from there family right. why should anybody else be treated differently. so now the laws are changing im getting confused. so now they come and as long as they breed they wont be deported is this what im understanding?
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6264195 06/21/1808:03 AM06/21/1808:03 AM
For days all we saw on the news was everyone from both parties demanding that Trump change this policy. So Trump changed the policy. Now all we see on the news is criticism of Trump for flip-flopping and reversing policy.
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: Hupurest]
#6264202 06/21/1808:15 AM06/21/1808:15 AM
Businesses that knowingly hire illegals should be have all of their assets seized and auctioned off, why do we only/mostly target illegals and not the businesses that employ them? This would end immigration problems nearly immediately.
The key word is "knowingly"... you need to prove that the business KNEW that the person had fake documents, and then still hired them anyhow....
If they have a SS#, a state ID that match, then what? I am unaware of a database that a company can use to search and see if the ss# matches the name. so when they type it in, Jesus Espenoza's SS# doesn't match Doris McGinny that the ss# belongs to....
Perhaps that would be the solution.....everytime anyone gets a job, they get a background check like a 4473, to make sure everything matches... But, thats just more government.... and we all know what more government creates......Problems....
and calls to seize the business and assets? what is this, Venezuela? and you'd be in favor of putting all the Americans working there out of jobs, because the company unknowingly hired 20 illegals to pluck chicken feathers?
This is Bull, I have one employee and if I screw up my with-holding by one penny, I will get a hundred dollar fine and have to spend hours on the phone with some IRS mouth piece trying to resolve it. I don't believe we should seize companies but atleast make them sit on hold for hours and then talk to some irs employee who could give a *&^% about their problem.
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6264220 06/21/1809:08 AM06/21/1809:08 AM
I stand by what I said, companies that knowingly hire illegals should be seized! If you hire illegals you are contributing to wage stagnation and unemployment, you are betraying your own people for a few shekels of profit. Look at the dairy industry, it is dyeing right in front of us as small family farms fold one after another and creameries have to send suicide prevention material out with milk checks, yet HUGE corporate dairies are still being built and expanded, these corporate dairies are relying on immigrant labor to cut the throats of the family farm with. Seize and auction off any business CHEATING the system and hiring illegals.
Last edited by Donnersurvivor; 06/21/1809:08 AM.
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6264225 06/21/1809:16 AM06/21/1809:16 AM
Through our taxes we have to fund illegal immigrants education, healthcare, border enforcement, we have to deal with the criminal element that comes in unchecked, we have wage stagnation even with our low unemployment, as legal U.S citizens we deal with all of this so a few can profit off of illegal labor, its is time to end this nonsense and go after the businesses that are profiting at the expense of hard working legal tax paying citizens.
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6264247 06/21/1809:51 AM06/21/1809:51 AM
NBC is a joke what a one sided tell the story how they want you to think and believe. Even in pictures they show shows what they want you people to see so that you are haters of one of the republican party.
I hope all this hate they show comes back and things even out.
Give me a fish, I will eat for a day. Teach me to fish, I will eat for a lifetime
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6264253 06/21/1810:10 AM06/21/1810:10 AM
We have a number of 400 to 1200 cow dairies in my area and most of them use Mexican labor, supposedly they are all legal. Not sure how a farmer can verify status and I don't think they try very hard. They get housing and make good money but they work alot of hours.
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6264296 06/21/1811:33 AM06/21/1811:33 AM
I've said it for years. Fine a business that uses illegals $10,000 per illegal and ENFORCE IT! No company would hire them. The jobs for illegals would dry up and that would greatly reduce the problem. It is not hard to come to the United States to work legally as long as you are not a criminal with a record. You can apply for a work visa and legally work here. There is no excuse. CASE CLOSED
Last edited by Finster; 06/21/1811:34 AM.
I BELIEVE IN MY GOD, MY COUNTRY AND IN MYSELF.
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6264300 06/21/1811:40 AM06/21/1811:40 AM
I hear that a lot, but it's always from people that refuse to admit that the US has a lot of problems. It seems that anyone who mentions US militarism, the police state, the poor education, or any of the numerous other issues we have is told to shut up and wave the flag. Personally I'd like to see us work towards more freedom, but from what I see on this thread love of big daddy government and the police state has been mistaken for patriotism.
I hear that a lot, but it's always from people that refuse to admit that the US has a lot of problems. It seems that anyone who mentions US militarism, the police state, the poor education, or any of the numerous other issues we have is told to shut up and wave the flag. Personally I'd like to see us work towards more freedom, but from what I see on this thread love of big daddy government and the police state has been mistaken for patriotism.
I've been told this and i'll pass it along. Life is great here if your strong.
I've said it for years. Fine a business that uses illegals $10,000 per illegal and ENFORCE IT! No company would hire them. The jobs for illegals would dry up and that would greatly reduce the problem. It is not hard to come to the United States to work legally as long as you are not a criminal with a record. You can apply for a work visa and legally work here. There is no excuse. CASE CLOSED
There are MILLIONS of non businesses ( individuals , many anti immigration ) who hire illegals to perform all kinds of tasks and projects so they can save a buck . These hypocrites talk out both sides of their mouth.
no way to run this issue down
Build a wall , mount some guns
Funny how the sound of gun fire is the same in all languages and an effective deterant to all but the deaf
The reason the illegal aliens keep invading the US is that rewards outweigh the risk of being caught. To stop illegals from coming here, the consequences of coming here illegally need to be more severe, employers need to be severely punished for hiring illegals, nothing good or of value should be given to illegals, organizations that give support to illegals need to be severely punished. This would stop illegal immigration and probably will never happen because of the money and emotion involved.
The only other option is to build a physical barrier, like a wall.
There are other options, most would prefer to avoid,but we cant seem to land the coin on edge. We've been seeing this since Reagan's amnesty! When will anything be done!
Trump's Great Wall won't work, and will waste a trillion dollars before it's built. I hope the wall is never funded, but if it is, just wait and see how high the tab will be.
Many of these illegals are fleeing horrific conditions at home, according to reports. The punishment would have to be extreme for it to deter them. I doubt the US would sink to that level. The Godwin Principle would go out the window.
All we can do is detain them humanely and deport them, as fast as we catch them.
Jim
Forum Infidel since 2001
"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
Yep..Just read the US is going to start opening military reservations to house them like up to 20,000. Looks like the US is going to be in the migrant camp business. Even read another article that the migrants just wait for the border patrol to pick them up.
Last edited by Chamacat; 06/21/1810:43 PM.
I can catch them here...I can catch them ANYWHERE
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6264716 06/22/1812:40 AM06/22/1812:40 AM
Yep..Just read the US is going to start opening military reservations to house them like up to 20,000. Looks like the US is going to be in the migrant camp business. Even read another article that the migrants just wait for the border patrol to pick them up.
That's better than catch and release....but it is not ideal. We could run busloads of them up north and give em a choice of one year forced labor or walk across the border into trudland.
E 'Honey Badger Militia' Sleep, the anti woke adote.
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: Marty]
#6264751 06/22/1806:40 AM06/22/1806:40 AM
Yep..Just read that the children that are separated from families are at an estimated cost above $700.00 per nite. However the family unit is around $400.00 per nite.
I can catch them here...I can catch them ANYWHERE
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6264767 06/22/1807:22 AM06/22/1807:22 AM
Yep..What I was reading was all the costs involved. Medical/Dental/Lodging/Logistics/Legal Fees/Meals ..And whatever other costs not mentioned. I'm sure that whatever business is involved also includes their bottom line of profit margin. It's a new frontier with millions to be made.
Last edited by Chamacat; 06/22/1807:32 AM.
I can catch them here...I can catch them ANYWHERE
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: hrdtoflw]
#6264915 06/22/1811:27 AM06/22/1811:27 AM
I'm sure none of you supporters of this would have any trouble recieving a half dozen of the 10,000 unoccompanied minors they are holding. do us a favor and get some.
Just seen a news clip of a child that has been shown on TV and the internet a billion times. She is crying and of course the story is about the kids being separated. Well that child's mother is 3 away from her but of course the press shows and tells us what they want us to see and hear. The kid was crying and walking around lost and her mother was right there. These kids most likely are treated better being separated from their parents then being with them at least for some any way.
Give me a fish, I will eat for a day. Teach me to fish, I will eat for a lifetime
Trump's Great Wall won't work, and will waste a trillion dollars before it's built. I hope the wall is never funded, but if it is, just wait and see how high the tab will be.
It would make a lot less area to have to guard. With sensors we can tell if they are tunneling under ask Israel or the Vatican.
Some individuals use statistics as a drunk man uses lamp-posts — for support rather than for illumination.
Andrew Lang (1844-1912) Scottish poet, novelist and literary critic
the libs have 28 months to get as many illegals as possible into 31 states so they can change the result of the electoral college to one that is favorable to them. That is exactly what their goal is.
E 'Honey Badger Militia' Sleep, the anti woke adote.
We had a wall to be built that was agreed upon during the Reagan administration. Later the Dumbocrats refused to fund it. $113 BILLION a year we are paying for the Illegal aliens EVERY year with what looks to be a lot more this year.
The democrats leadership is not dumb, they are devious. They know full well that they are harming poor Americans, by enabling and supporting illegal immigration. They will just farm the illegals for votes, like the rest of the gullible they manipulate now.
A border wall WILL work if it is built right. Make it hard enough to by pass it they will have to find another way. Cost for that would be prohibitive without a lot of backing. Sensors could be built into the wall for digging. Digging a tunnel under in sand or through rock isn't going to be cheap and easy like a fence that stops at ground level.
Some individuals use statistics as a drunk man uses lamp-posts — for support rather than for illumination.
Andrew Lang (1844-1912) Scottish poet, novelist and literary critic
Yep..Just read the US is going to start opening military reservations to house them like up to 20,000. Looks like the US is going to be in the migrant camp business. Even read another article that the migrants just wait for the border patrol to pick them up.
if it’s the same quality housing we live in then it sounds like a pretty good punishment to me
If they don't like the policy that the United States has for being here illegally. They could alway keep their sorry arses back in there own country to avoid any hardship on their families. The choice is their's not ours. Play by the rules and you will not get burned, it's that simple. I don't feel sorry for them at all.
We will have to disagree on the wall though. I think I'll be proved right, mainly because it will take longer than Trump's term (or terms, if you are a true believer) just to get rights to the property underlying the wall.
For the full 1,000 miles, Trump’s 30-foot wall (with a 10-foot tunnel barrier) would cost $31.2 billion, or $31.2 million per mile, according to the best estimate from Massachusetts Institute of Technology engineers.
With it costing us $113 BILLION a year we would be ahead to build it. The Whole article was full of if, maybe and buts. If fences and walls didn't work why is that the main security for prisons? They also do that in the big city with gated communities. As far as can't see past them between satellites and drones they could tell a lot more. When they can read a license plate using a satellite I am sure they can see a backhoe or dozer. To tunnel under they would have to support the over burden and the trucks bringing that in will leave tracks.
Any system used can be defeated or even sabotaged to look like it is worthless.If used in conjunction with making it less attractive to employers and landlords it would help a lot. Terrorists is another reason this is needed.
We tried the trust the Democrats back during the Reagan days with the Simpson/ Mazzoli act. They quit funding it.
Some individuals use statistics as a drunk man uses lamp-posts — for support rather than for illumination.
Andrew Lang (1844-1912) Scottish poet, novelist and literary critic
Life member NTA , and GA Trappers assoc .
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6265876 06/24/1801:43 AM06/24/1801:43 AM
In Texas, any new wall would have to be built some distance from the border, because the line itself runs down the middle of the Rio Grande. To gauge the possible impact, the USA TODAY NETWORK used the state's open-records law to obtain digital property maps from all 13 Texas counties with border frontage. (A 14th county touches the border only at one point, accounting for a single parcel.)
All told, a network analysis shows, about 4,900 parcels of property sit within 500 feet of the border in Texas.
Most Texas land is privately owned, a fact that could complicate and delay efforts to build a wall in a state that reveres private-property rights.
There is no public map of exactly where, or for how far, a future border wall would run. Some of the wall would surely be on land already owned by the federal government, such as levees. But the 4,900-parcel swath gives a sense of the massive land seizure and cost that the federal government could face.
Is such a seizure feasible? After the 2006 Secure Fence Act, federal officials pursued private land in Texas for the current border fences. More than 300 condemnation cases were brought against landowners, according to data compiled by the network.
Some cases were settled for as little as a $100 easement. In one, the U.S. paid $5 million for 6 acres. Many, though, have yet to be settled.
As of summer 2017, nine years after the first cases were filed, 85 of the more than 300 cases were still in litigation. Some landowners died fighting their cases through the system.
Because taking property for a wall would be the region's second round of condemnation, people will be ready to fight for just compensation, says Terence M. Garrett, chair of the Public Affairs and Security Studies Department at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley. Based on last time, he predicts, about 20 percent of people will accept what the government offers; 80 percent will not.
"Here we are in a decade and the judge still has eminent-domain cases pending in his court," Garrett says. "It's really a thicket, if you will, of all kinds of legal problems. We are looking at years, decades, of court cases."
Forum Infidel since 2001
"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6265880 06/24/1801:51 AM06/24/1801:51 AM
I saw eminent-domain in action for building a highway in Missouri. They came through and within a few years took EVERYTHING they wanted to include historical building that were privately owned. With the last supreme court decision about seizure there is no real protection of private land.
Some individuals use statistics as a drunk man uses lamp-posts — for support rather than for illumination.
Andrew Lang (1844-1912) Scottish poet, novelist and literary critic
Life member NTA , and GA Trappers assoc .
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6265881 06/24/1802:01 AM06/24/1802:01 AM
Another reason not to build a wall is that a wall won't stop anyone unless it's guarded. How many guards would we need for a 2,000-mile border wall? How much is that going to cost?
Jim
Forum Infidel since 2001
"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6265882 06/24/1802:08 AM06/24/1802:08 AM
LOL a 30 foot wall will stop a lot of folks. Not many running around with a 30 foot ladder on their back. Closed circuit monitors can help cover as well. Infrared sensors help as well. Looking to offset the $113 Billion a year we can put a bunch of guards on it as well and still be ahead. We can patch the hole in our boat now and start bailing or later when it will cost even more and take longer to clean the mess up or wait until it is too late.
Some individuals use statistics as a drunk man uses lamp-posts — for support rather than for illumination.
Andrew Lang (1844-1912) Scottish poet, novelist and literary critic
Life member NTA , and GA Trappers assoc .
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6265904 06/24/1805:38 AM06/24/1805:38 AM
I still the think it would be more productive to aggressively prosecute employers of illegals. If someone employs an illegal unknowingly they should have checked and known. Wont impede gangsters and other dope fiends but border patrol would have more time to hunt them.
Did you ever see the old Berlin wall Pete? It did pretty much stop illegal border crossing. For about 30 years, then was tore down. Wonder what tearing down cost?
I doubt any body will be shot for breeching Trumps wall so I don't think it will work as good as the Berlin wall did.
Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6265906 06/24/1805:52 AM06/24/1805:52 AM
They separate the kids from their Parents. The Parents get kicked out of the Country, while at the same time; the Government is "Housing" those kids. Since the Parents are now out of the Country, how are they supposed to return the kids to the Parents AND if they cannot FIND the Parents after they were booted back to their own Country; what is the Government supposed to do with all those kids ?
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6266020 06/24/1809:20 AM06/24/1809:20 AM
Another reason not to build a wall is that a wall won't stop anyone unless it's guarded. How many guards would we need for a 2,000-mile border wall? How much is that going to cost?
Jim
Is easy to advocate for open borders when your sitting up there in Alaska .
I take it you've never spent much time in a s hole city overrun with illegals
Report a post club - Non member
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: danny clifton]
#6266085 06/24/1811:10 AM06/24/1811:10 AM
I still the think it would be more productive to aggressively prosecute employers of illegals. If someone employs an illegal unknowingly they should have checked and known. Wont impede gangsters and other dope fiends but border patrol would have more time to hunt them.
Did you ever see the old Berlin wall Pete? It did pretty much stop illegal border crossing. For about 30 years, then was tore down. Wonder what tearing down cost?
I doubt any body will be shot for breeching Trumps wall so I don't think it will work as good as the Berlin wall did.
You keep beating the " prosecute employers " drum.
What about all the non business people ( millions ) who hire illegals for odd jobs around the house ?
Should you be prosecuted if you buy a taco on the street corner ?
There are millions of illegals running their own business or working for individuals . Not businesses
Their networking capabilities are unbelievable including full infiltration into all social services agencies.
Report a post club - Non member
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6266089 06/24/1811:15 AM06/24/1811:15 AM
The libs just are doing this to take away from the positive results Trump is having on the economy the korean deal ... They could care less about the kids . Think about it , the majority of them are pro abortion . Kinda strange to think they would care about the life of a child .
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: AntiGov]
#6266097 06/24/1811:31 AM06/24/1811:31 AM
Also, by making government smaller it is less able to hand out freebies, favors and goodies to voters, potential voters and other people present. Neither current major political party has ANY intention of making government irrelevant enough to take away its potential to hand out these things BECAUSE by doing so would take away the POWER that these parties believe belongs rightfully to them.
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6266112 06/24/1811:54 AM06/24/1811:54 AM
The states will become as corrupt as DC or worse. Then who will you complain about. The no wallers need to send their address to the border. You can feed cloth house pay med bills legal bills and anything else they think they deserve. About 50 to a acre should be about right to house them. Start sending those addresses
The states will become as corrupt as DC or worse. Then who will you complain about. The no wallers need to send their address to the border. You can feed cloth house pay med bills legal bills and anything else they think they deserve. About 50 to a acre should be about right to house them. Start sending those addresses
All you " no wallers " haven't offered up anything to combat illegal immigration
Either you don't care about the nasty consequences and enormous costs associated or you are just simply clueless
I have twice. End the drug war and government administered welfare.
Yep.
As long as we keep subsidizing illegals with rent, food, and medical they will keep taking the risk to come here. End all the freebies and they'll either not come because it's economically infeasible or they'll have to demand a living wage that will force them to compete with folks here.
And the drug cartels have the resources to find a way around the wall... They can hire 100 local men at $20 US a day to dig under the wall... And they'll have a line of people around the block waiting for their chance to get some of that money. They won't care if it costs $50,000 to get it done. They're looking at it as a business expense associated with moving millions of dollars worth of product.
Financial incentives are unstoppable. If you eliminate or mitigate the incentives the problem will take care of itself.
It's Prohibition all over again. Just different products (people/dope) at the center of the fight.
Mike
One man with a gun may control 100 others who have none.
I don't consider myself to be anti wall in regards to stem the tide of illegal immigrants, I do believe there are these things I have talked about that would be much much much more effective. These things are obviously not politically palatable, as it is uncomfortable to realize that the political group you align yourself with has no intention of A)making government smaller B)ending the drug war.
As far as ending the welfare state, Dr. Thomas Sowell has recently written a book I am currently reading that discusses it in depth. The main point is that humans seem incapable of judging the OUTCOME of policies and only look at the intentions. The intentions of providing a great society and care for our brother citizen thru welfare were right and good. The results of these government programs have been around long enough to study and look at the results. The results are dismal, TO OUR OWN CITIZENS, let alone those who arrive here without permission. Here is a 45 MINUTE youtube interview with Thomas Sowell, if you are interested in the subject please watch it.
I don't consider myself to be anti wall in regards to stem the tide of illegal immigrants, I do believe there are these things I have talked about that would be much much much more effective. These things are obviously not politically palatable, as it is uncomfortable to realize that the political group you align yourself with has no intention of A)making government smaller B)ending the drug war.
Neither does your political group, so you can come down off your high horse now. You know i can post your guys saying they want to ADD people to enforce their grand ideas.
(and i've already posted them before but you over-look them) It's easy to put words on your platform, but a whole other world once ya get elected, or even get asked real questions when your a candidate. Then reality sets in.
Didn't take long for the anti wall folks to show up. I agree as anyone that can think knows a wall alone won't stop them for long. Many other things can HELP as well. Anything man made can be defeated or undone by the next elected.
Anyone saying they will just tunnel under hasn't worked in a mine or educated themselves on what it would take to build a tunnel that could handle the traffic load. It wouldn't be in operation long before it was discovered and shut down. How many tunnels have you heard of going under the great wall of china or for that matter the Berlin wall?
Some individuals use statistics as a drunk man uses lamp-posts — for support rather than for illumination.
Andrew Lang (1844-1912) Scottish poet, novelist and literary critic
If the cartels construct a tunnel they will not be bring illegal immigrants thru it...anyone who thinks they will is not too bright. Plenty of those folks around..
E 'Honey Badger Militia' Sleep, the anti woke adote.
The cartels already have tunnels constructed under what border us already fenced, so you are wrong Marty. These cartels aren't drug addicted fools. They are in control of a very profitable black market. Once the wall is up, the risk and price of human smuggling will rise to the point where more cartels will become involved in it than are now. If a wall is needed, fine; but don't be blinded by the simple solution. It seems doing the uncomfortable things is off the table politically. End the welfare state and end the drug war.
The cartels already have tunnels constructed under what border us already fenced, so you are wrong Marty. These cartels aren't drug addicted fools. They are in control of a very profitable black market. Once the wall is up, the risk and price of human smuggling will rise to the point where more cartels will become involved in it than are now. If a wall is needed, fine; but don't be blinded by the simple solution. It seems doing the uncomfortable things is off the table politically. End the welfare state and end the drug war.
So you admit it will make a difference. Increased human activity will make detection easier. With less area to have to keep watch over the hot spots can be covered better. Add to that legislation to make it less profitable as in employer requirements to verify status along with fines.There is no one thing that can cure it all.
Some individuals use statistics as a drunk man uses lamp-posts — for support rather than for illumination.
Andrew Lang (1844-1912) Scottish poet, novelist and literary critic
It is odd that one would surmise human activity would be noticed on a line streching from California to Texas using high technology, yet the placement of Improvised explosive devices on main supply routes in an area inundated with military in Afghanistan could not be stopped when lives and limbs were/are on the line.
That's what they're trying to tell ya. Get the activity concentrated like militery to a supply route and they knew right where to place the IED'S. We'll be able to locate them easier when they are forced to a certain route.
I would be willing to bet they get as good FREE health care as felons in state prisons. Maybe if that aint good enough they could volunteer to go back to Mexico without a hearing and get quality health care from a brujo
Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
So James you are OK with having to keep spending $113 Billion a year with no end or fix in sight rather then build a wall? How many Trillion has this cost us over the years?
Some individuals use statistics as a drunk man uses lamp-posts — for support rather than for illumination.
Andrew Lang (1844-1912) Scottish poet, novelist and literary critic
Life member NTA , and GA Trappers assoc .
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6266519 06/25/1801:26 AM06/25/1801:26 AM
A whole bunch of yeah it won't work because I say so besides if, maybe and but. What we have now isn't doing what we need done. If doing it by legislation what will make the next in the Whitehouse follow the law instead of ignore it?
Some individuals use statistics as a drunk man uses lamp-posts — for support rather than for illumination.
Andrew Lang (1844-1912) Scottish poet, novelist and literary critic
Life member NTA , and GA Trappers assoc .
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6266522 06/25/1802:01 AM06/25/1802:01 AM
the situation could be better ameliorated by UNDOING legislation already in place. drug war and welfare state. those two things make the billions spent on aliens and the cost of the wall look like peanuts in comparison.
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6266523 06/25/1802:52 AM06/25/1802:52 AM
wont cost much to take away incentives to come here. health care, employment, free education, food stamps, monetary subsidies. those things need to be done first.
end the war on drugs and natural selection will take care of our drug addict problem. it will end organized crime. we didn't have organized crime till alcohol was made illegal. that one stupid idea started all of it.
when those things are done we likely wont see reason for a wall. if it gets built I suspect it will be like the berlin wall and get torn down after a few decades.
Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: Rat Masterson]
#6266568 06/25/1806:58 AM06/25/1806:58 AM
We have a number of 400 to 1200 cow dairies in my area and most of them use Mexican labor, supposedly they are all legal. Not sure how a farmer can verify status and I don't think they try very hard. They get housing and make good money but they work alot of hours.
These Mexicans aren't the problem. They came here to work.
Life ain't supposed to be easy.
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6266578 06/25/1807:36 AM06/25/1807:36 AM
Even if this flow of illegals coming across the borders was stopped, there's enough breeding welfare Demorats in the country, the working man will be bred out of existence in less than 20 years. There will be no incentive to work left other than to simply provide for yourself.
Life ain't supposed to be easy.
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6266587 06/25/1808:00 AM06/25/1808:00 AM
wont cost much to take away incentives to come here. health care, employment, free education, food stamps, monetary subsidies. those things need to be done first.
end the war on drugs and natural selection will take care of our drug addict problem. it will end organized crime. we didn't have organized crime till alcohol was made illegal. that one stupid idea started all of it.
when those things are done we likely wont see reason for a wall. if it gets built I suspect it will be like the berlin wall and get torn down after a few decades.
Do you not think America has been fighting the war on drugs for 50 years? Do you really think the war on drugs can be won and maintained forever? Come on man!
"The more people I meet the more I love my dog!"
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6266613 06/25/1808:59 AM06/25/1808:59 AM
Why would anyone be surprised that a communist calls for a cultural and political invasion of another country? Leon Trotsky called for the same thing shortly after the soviet revolution. Communism is a dead political ideology and has little chance of being democratically elected to any office of importance in north america. However, the resistance to changing the things HERE in America that could help alleviate the invasion are being resisted in the left by postmodern neo-marxists. They are the new communist threat. I dont have a reason why those on the political right are resistant to do things that would actually help the problem. I have a feeling it is due the underlying character traits of most conservatives to be resistant to any kind of change.
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6266634 06/25/1809:40 AM06/25/1809:40 AM
Read this. Center for immigration studies. Mexico's forgotten southern border. I know it's a long read,but it will wake some of you no-wallers up to the true reality of this clear threat to our country.
Or we can build towers every 2 miles,arm them with 4 man teams 3 shifts a day. And Barrett 50 cals.
And yes I will sign up will you.
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6266643 06/25/1809:58 AM06/25/1809:58 AM
If that's what your talking about I fail to see any relevance to today. That article is from 2002. Mexico is encouraging and providing passage through mexico of central americans.
No I wont sign to kill people for crossing a border. I tried to get a job with the border patrol 10-12 years ago only to find out they thought I was to old.
Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
A lifelong friend of my wife works at a small packaging plant and also doubles as the interpreter as no one speaks english. Im sure ICE will pay them a visit sometime soon.
Think the July 1st elections in Mexico will have any effect?
As I understand it:
amlo is ahead in polls by 16%. He proposes mass immigration into America as a right for south americans and also amnesty for drug cartels. Devout socialist.
Over 100 candidates running with the opposition to amlo party have been assassinated recently.
E 'Honey Badger Militia' Sleep, the anti woke adote.
Could you imagine the outrage if a conservative had proposed people do this to Obama administration members:
The backlash against Trump administration immigration policies has in a matter of days escalated from routine protests to a strategy that includes confronting Cabinet members and other Trump-tied officials in virtually any public venue.
Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters of California over the weekend sought to bring the 'resistance' to a new level when she urged supporters to swarm Cabinet members at gas stations and anywhere else they're seen.
"If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere," Waters said.
The libs have nothing to loose by going all out, anything is possible.....with the Trump POTUS win they realize that without millions more illegals voting for them they could be done. Trump needs to double down. I hope they do not start assassinating Trumps people. But that could very well happen.
E 'Honey Badger Militia' Sleep, the anti woke adote.
the situation could be better ameliorated by UNDOING legislation already in place. drug war and welfare state. those two things make the billions spent on aliens and the cost of the wall look like peanuts in comparison.
I agree.
The difference between animals and humans is that animals would never let the dumbest ones lead the pack.
Trump is getting the blame for abhorrent conditions, separation of children from their families, detention centers, etc. This was put in place by President Clinton in 1997 call the Flores Consent Decree that separated kids from parents who entered US illegally. Bush and Obama both upheld the law and maintained detention centers and separated children from their illegal parents. But, they never were chastised by the main stream media or either political party for it.
Trump gets the blame for upholding the law same as the last 3 presidents did. Only what they did was looked at differently.
The difference between animals and humans is that animals would never let the dumbest ones lead the pack.
Trump is getting the blame for abhorrent conditions, separation of children from their families, detention centers, etc. This was put in place by President Clinton in 1997 call the Flores Consent Decree that separated kids from parents who entered US illegally. Bush and Obama both upheld the law and maintained detention centers and separated children from their illegal parents. But, they never were chastised by the main stream media or either political party for it.
Trump gets the blame for upholding the law same as the last 3 presidents did. Only what they did was looked at differently.
Not true. The current crises of family separation was caused by the Trump administration's decision to prosecute all adults caught illegally entering the country. Prior presidents deported families they caught, but Trump is prosecuting the adults for being here illegally. Prior presidents didn't prosecute except for other crimes, but settled for deporting them directly.
They are entitled to jury trials if prosecuted, each one of them. If deportation proceedings are used, they are only entitled to an administrative hearing. Trying them means we will support them in prison, under conditions that may be better than they had at home, for the length of their sentence. Most likely they will be given suspended sentences and ordered deported.
Trump has taken a step that Obama and predecessors did not take. It's untrue, fake news, to say he's doing the same thing they did.
Jim
Forum Infidel since 2001
"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
James I suggest you listen to a few interviews with obumers DHS secretary Jeh Johnson. Come on your a lawyer you should know this flora ruling And obumer changed it through exec order in 2014 Come on man get your case straight And I'm just a Nazi who likes to read A lot. I rest my case
James I suggest you listen to a few interviews with obumers DHS secretary Jeh Johnson. Come on your a lawyer you should know this flora ruling And obumer changed it through exec order in 2014 Come on man get your case straight And I'm just a Nazi who likes to read A lot. I rest my case
Not much of a case. You didn't provide any links, nor anything but vague references.
Jim
Forum Infidel since 2001
"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
If Obama was doing the same thing, shame on him. I didn't know about it, or I would have objected then.
Regardless who was in charge of this heartless program, all I'm saying now is that we have a moral, if not legal, obligation to try to reunite these families.
Jim
Forum Infidel since 2001
"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
James I agree we take families apart,we have the obligation to reunite those families. As far as putting up links lol I just learned how to do a quote on here. I do all this on my phone.
If Obama was doing the same thing, shame on him. I didn't know about it, or I would have objected then.
Regardless who was in charge of this heartless program, all I'm saying now is that we have a moral, if not legal, obligation to try to reunite these families.
Jim
Legal obligation James?
I wonder if tap dancers walk into a room, look at the floor, and think, I'd tap that. I wonder about things.....
It shouldn't be catch-and-release, like prior presidents did it. We should detain these families together until they can be deported or their claims for asylum heard.
Jim
Forum Infidel since 2001
"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
If Obama was doing the same thing, shame on him. I didn't know about it, or I would have objected then.
Regardless who was in charge of this heartless program, all I'm saying now is that we have a moral, if not legal, obligation to try to reunite these families.
Jim
Legal obligation James?
I said "if not" a legal obligation. That means I don't know, but regardless, we have a moral obligation.
Jim
Forum Infidel since 2001
"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
We should unite the families of illegal aliens, that we separated, when they chose to illegally invade our country, but it should be somewhere else then here. We are wasting to much money, time and resources on these criminals. We need a wall.
If Obama was doing the same thing, shame on him. I didn't know about it, or I would have objected then.
Regardless who was in charge of this heartless program, all I'm saying now is that we have a moral, if not legal, obligation to try to reunite these families.
Jim
I remember you saying those exact same words awhile back..."if Obama was doing the same thing".
Former Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson appeared on “Fox News Sunday” and said illegal immigrant children were being separated from their families under President Barack Obama.
“We believed it was necessary at the time,” Johnson said of the highly controversial practice. “I still believe it is necessary.”
Fox News host Chris Wallace showed images of illegal immigrants, to include minors, being held in jail facilities, saying the Obama administration “started jailing entire families” in 2014, before asking Johnson if they handled it well back then.
The question coming amid the media-generated firestorm over illegal immigrants being treated much the same way under the Trump administration — albeit under improved living conditions, according to President Trump.
“In some cases, not a lot, but in some, you separated children from their parents in these pictures that we are putting up,” Wallace said.
Johnson did not run away from the reality being depicted on screen.
“Well, Chris, without a doubt the images and the reality from 2014 just like 2018 are not pretty,” he said. “And so, we expanded family detention. We had then 34,000 beds for family detention, only 95 of 34,000 equipped to deal with families.”
Johnson acknowledged that it was “controversial” — fortunately for him, the media had a slobbering love affair with the Obama administration, which limited any real impact from the decision.
“We believed it was necessary at the time,” he added. “I still believe it is necessary to main a certain capability for families. We cannot have catch and release and in my three years we deported or repatriated, or returned over a million people.”
Ironically, Johnson mimicked President Trump’s insistence Sunday that the problem must be dealt with at the border.
“But, again, you can deal with this on the border,” the former Obama administration official said. “You can try different things. We did not want to go so far as to separate families.”
Trump took to Twitter on Sunday to say our immigration laws are a mockery and that illegal immigrants arriving at our border need to be sent “back from where they came” without going through any judicial process.
If you're talking about the Flores settlement and consent decree, Wetdog, my understanding is that it says children can only be detained with parents for twenty days, and thereafter the government must use best feasible means to detain them. Or somesuch. Didn't the case arise because the government was holding children with non-family adults? I don't feel like Googling at the moment.
And I'm not familiar with the executive order you're talking about.
Jim
Forum Infidel since 2001
"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
Not sure if it's a complete moral obligation or not, but letting people in all willy nilly ain't working out well for Germany. Merkel can't form a Gov't. We have a lot of people here that could use some of that moral obligation.
I wonder if tap dancers walk into a room, look at the floor, and think, I'd tap that. I wonder about things.....
Catch I agree I'm I favor of the wall BIG AND TALL After today's SCOTUS ruling things are looking. It frees Trump to inact operation cablesplicer brought into being in 2008
Now we giving illegals free cable too? I bet they'll watch CNN enspanol.
One report I saw, showed illegal minors playing video games on a bigger big screen TV than we have, yet the left keeps comparing the detention centers to concentration camps in Nazi Germany.
Minor, illegal aliens get free medical, free dental, free meals, free education, free internet, free phone, free cable, recess, toys and free psychological counseling, while in the detention facilities. I have little doubt that's the best place they have ever lived in their lives and that it's nicer than where many Americans live too.
Keith
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6267944 06/27/1801:14 AM06/27/1801:14 AM
There was a real problem when Obama did the reunite or farm the kids out to those that claimed them as family. Seems a large group of them ended up in the human trafficking. Human Traffiking Even Snopes says it is true. How short of doing DNA tests can you be sure they are even related let alone parents? Any parent that would put a child into this dangerous of an undertaking should lose any right to them.
Like it or not the wall would HELP a lot by turning more away.
Last edited by Drifter; 06/27/1803:55 AM.
Some individuals use statistics as a drunk man uses lamp-posts — for support rather than for illumination.
Andrew Lang (1844-1912) Scottish poet, novelist and literary critic
Life member NTA , and GA Trappers assoc .
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: James]
#6267970 06/27/1805:44 AM06/27/1805:44 AM
I never heard about it then, and maybe we only heard about the policy now because Trump has increased the scale of the operation.
The media didn't do its job. Why didn't Fox News break the story when Obama was in office?
Jim
Seriously Jim?
Maybe it's a regional thing but there were protest all the time against Obama's immigration policy. Rarely would make national news but anyone that lives in a city was well aware of it and something that many liberals took issue with against Obama.
Re: over 100 illegals arrested yesterday
[Re: bass10]
#6267977 06/27/1806:13 AM06/27/1806:13 AM
I don't believe there is a magic cure all, it will take a multi prong cure. There will still be some slip through but sitting on our hands isn't the answer. I see now a federal judge has ruled all must be reunited. So now we can add more expense to holding them until the trial date as you can't hold the children in a general population prison system.The problem can't be ignored as it keeps growing.
Some individuals use statistics as a drunk man uses lamp-posts — for support rather than for illumination.
Andrew Lang (1844-1912) Scottish poet, novelist and literary critic
In defending its “zero tolerance” border policy that has caused the separation of families, the Trump administration has argued that the Obama and Bush administrations did this too. That’s misleading. Experts say there were some separations under previous administrations, but no blanket policy to prosecute parents and, therefore, separate them from their children.
“Bush and Obama did not have policies that resulted in the mass separation of parents and children like we’re seeing under the current administration,” Sarah Pierce, a policy analyst with the Migration Policy Institute, told us.
Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen said at a June 18 press briefing: “The Obama administration, the Bush administration all separated families. … They did — their rate was less than ours, but they absolutely did do this. This is not new.”
Nielsen went on to explain that there is indeed something new, as we wrote in another article on this topic. Under a “zero tolerance policy” on illegal immigration announced by Attorney General Jeff Sessions in early April, the administration is now referring all illegal border crossings for criminal prosecution. By doing that, parents have been separated from their children, because children can’t be held in detention facilities for adults.
DHS told us that 2,342 children were separated from their parents between May 5 and June 9.
But DHS couldn’t provide any statistics on how many children may have been separated from their parents under the Obama administration.
Instead, when we asked, it pointed to numbers that show 21 percent of apprehended adults were referred for prosecution under President Barack Obama. From fiscal year 2010 to fiscal 2016, there were 2,362,966 adults apprehended illegally crossing the Southern border, and 492,970 were referred for prosecution, those figures show. But that doesn’t tell us anything about how many children may have been separated from their parents under Obama.
And we don’t have such statistics to compare the past to the present.
“We have not seen any data out of the current or prior administration on how many cases that were prosecuted were individuals who arrived with minors,” Theresa Cardinal Brown, director of immigration and cross-border policy at the Bipartisan Policy Center, told us in an email. “So we cannot make any guesses or assumptions about how many separations based on prosecution there were or are.”
Brown said that even though DHS says 2,342 children have been separated from their parents in about one month, we don’t know what percentage of those cases are due to prosecutions for illegal crossings, and how many are due to other policies that would require separations — such as suspicion of trafficking, another outstanding warrant or insufficient proof of a family relationship.
We asked DHS if it would provide such a breakdown, but we haven’t received a response.
MPI’s Pierce said that the likely reason data aren’t available on child separations under previous administrations is because it was done in “really limited circumstances” such as suspicion of trafficking or other fraud.
“Previous administrations used family detention facilities, allowing the whole family to stay together while awaiting their deportation case in immigration court, or alternatives to detention, which required families to be tracked but released from custody to await their court date,” Brown and her co-author, Tim O’Shea, wrote in an explainer piece for the Bipartisan Policy Center’s website. “Some children may have been separated from the adults they entered with, in cases where the family relationship could not be established, child trafficking was suspected, or there were not sufficient family detention facilities available. … However, the zero-tolerance policy is the first time that a policy resulting in separation is being applied across the board.”
Jeh Johnson, DHS secretary under the Obama administration, told NPR earlier this month that he couldn’t say that family separations “never happened” during his tenure. “There may have been some exigent situation, some emergency. There may have been some doubt about whether the adult accompanying the child was in fact the parent of the child. I can’t say it never happened but not as a matter of policy or practice. It’s not something that I could ask our Border Patrol or our immigration enforcement personnel to do,” Johnson said.
The Obama administration faced a surge of unaccompanied children from Central America trying to cross the border in 2014. Cecilia Muñoz, director of the Obama administration’s Domestic Policy Council, told the New York Times this month that a multi-agency team was considering “every possible idea” at the time, including separating families. “I do remember looking at each other like, ‘We’re not going to do this, are we?’ We spent five minutes thinking it through and concluded that it was a bad idea,” the Times quoted Muñoz saying. “The morality of it was clear — that’s not who we are.”
Brown told us that while the Obama administration “did separate some families,” it also tried to detain families together. In 2016, a court ruling limited how long children with their parents could be in family detention centers. That ruling confirmed that a 1997 settlement applied to both unaccompanied and accompanied minors, as we’ve explained before.
“At that point,” Brown said, “family detention dwindled and most families were released into the US, either on their own with a notice to appear or under Alternatives to Detention, which could be an ankle bracelet or a supervised monitoring provision where they had to check in with ICE regularly until their immigration court hearing.”
On June 20, President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing Nielsen to keep families in custody together “during the pendency of any criminal improper entry or immigration proceedings involving their members” at least “to the extent permitted by law and subject to the availability of appropriations.”
DHS told us that 2,342 children were separated from their parents between May 5 and June 9.
But DHS couldn’t provide any statistics on how many children may have been separated from their parents under the Obama administration.
Amazing isn't it there is no data.
Quote:
2010 to fiscal 2016, there were 2,362,966 adults apprehended illegally crossing the Southern border, and 492,970 were referred for prosecution, those figures show.
Again they didn't track the data on how many had kids with them. When you have this amount of flow coming in and you aren't set up for it you have to do the best you can. The Illegal aliens are being looked at as blameless for any of this.
Some individuals use statistics as a drunk man uses lamp-posts — for support rather than for illumination.
Andrew Lang (1844-1912) Scottish poet, novelist and literary critic
Drifter, basically Obama and predecessors didn't have the problem of where to keep the children because they practiced "catch-and-release." They would release families into society until their administrative hearing date, and it should come as no surprise that most of them didn't show up.
Obama and predecessors didn't prosecute unless the illegal was charged with separate crimes from being here illegally. Catch-and-release was a bad policy, imho.
The crises arose because of Trump's decision to prosecute everybody who was here illegally. I think that's the right decision, but not until they have facilities for detaining families together.
Jim
Forum Infidel since 2001
"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
Drifter, basically Obama and predecessors didn't have the problem of where to keep the children because they practiced "catch-and-release." They would release families into society until their administrative hearing date, and it should come as no surprise that most of them didn't show up.
Sure about that?, He didn't get the moniker "Deporter in Chief" for no reason.
And yet the accumulation of recent congressional testimony has made it clear that the Obama administration itself engaged in the wholesale destruction and “loss” of tens of thousands of government records covered under the act as well as the intentional evasion of the government records recording system by engaging in private email exchanges. So far, former President Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former Attorney General Lynch and several EPA officials have been named as offenders. The IRS suffered record “losses” as well. Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy called it “an unauthorized private communications system for official business for the patent purpose of defeating federal record-keeping and disclosure laws.”
Does make one wonder what all has been hidden.
Some individuals use statistics as a drunk man uses lamp-posts — for support rather than for illumination.
Andrew Lang (1844-1912) Scottish poet, novelist and literary critic
Drifter, basically Obama and predecessors didn't have the problem of where to keep the children because they practiced "catch-and-release." They would release families into society until their administrative hearing date, and it should come as no surprise that most of them didn't show up.
There is a lot more to their catch and release as well. It has been found some were released to human traffickers. We are talking a few as in dozens and that is just the ones that have been caught up with. It was blatant enough even Snopes says it happened. So what are we to do? Clearly what was being done isn't working.
Some individuals use statistics as a drunk man uses lamp-posts — for support rather than for illumination.
Andrew Lang (1844-1912) Scottish poet, novelist and literary critic
Drifter, basically Obama and predecessors didn't have the problem of where to keep the children because they practiced "catch-and-release." They would release families into society until their administrative hearing date, and it should come as no surprise that most of them didn't show up.
Obama and predecessors didn't prosecute unless the illegal was charged with separate crimes from being here illegally. Catch-and-release was a bad policy, imho.
The crises arose because of Trump's decision to prosecute everybody who was here illegally. I think that's the right decision, but not until they have facilities for detaining families together.