No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 12 1 2 3 11 12
Reliability of the Bible #8413367
06/03/25 12:50 PM
06/03/25 12:50 PM
Joined: Dec 2024
North Pole, Alaska
Husky Offline OP
trapper
Husky  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Dec 2024
North Pole, Alaska
I found this interesting. Thought you people that think the Bible is false would like to see this.
[Linked Image]

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413368
06/03/25 12:54 PM
06/03/25 12:54 PM
Joined: Dec 2024
North Pole, Alaska
Husky Offline OP
trapper
Husky  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Dec 2024
North Pole, Alaska
And remember, no one doubts Plato, or Aristotle, or Homer ever lived, so why do people doubt that Jesus lived when is much more evidence for his life than the others?

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413372
06/03/25 01:11 PM
06/03/25 01:11 PM
Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
L
loosegoose Offline
trapper
loosegoose  Offline
trapper
L

Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
Even most secular historians agree that Jesus was a real person that lived in Israel about 2000 years ago. What they disagree on is whether or not he was the Son of God that performed miracles and died and came back to life.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413373
06/03/25 01:23 PM
06/03/25 01:23 PM
Joined: Oct 2017
perry co.Pa
wetdog Offline
trapper
wetdog  Offline
trapper

Joined: Oct 2017
perry co.Pa
Still waiting on your 6000 year timeline

Did you know Jesus was a common name back then?
Why do you think Judus had to kiss Jesus?
So the guards knew which Jesus to arrest, because there was more than one in the garden that night

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413377
06/03/25 01:29 PM
06/03/25 01:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
T
TreedaBlackdog Offline
trapper
TreedaBlackdog  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
But there is only 1 Jesus that picked up a guards ear and healed him! Pretty sure they knew then they got the right Jesus........what you think.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: wetdog] #8413380
06/03/25 01:33 PM
06/03/25 01:33 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
central Haudenosaunee, the De...
W
white marlin Offline
trapper
white marlin  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Jan 2007
central Haudenosaunee, the De...
Originally Posted by wetdog
Why do you think Judus had to kiss Jesus?
So the guards knew which Jesus to arrest, because there was more than one in the garden that night


curious how you know there was more than one Jesus present in that time and place...

could it be that Judas had to kiss Jesus because the soldiers didn't know Him personally? He was surrounded by 12 other guys.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413381
06/03/25 01:34 PM
06/03/25 01:34 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
T
TreedaBlackdog Offline
trapper
TreedaBlackdog  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
I bet Malchus had a tough night sleeping after a day like that and receiving the compassion of Christ directly and physically.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413382
06/03/25 01:40 PM
06/03/25 01:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
T
TreedaBlackdog Offline
trapper
TreedaBlackdog  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
Peter James and John were with Jesus - can't find any reference to the other 9 being present - I am open to scripture though - please show me if I am in error

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413383
06/03/25 01:40 PM
06/03/25 01:40 PM
Joined: May 2009
Champaign County, Ohio.
K
KeithC Offline
trapper
KeithC  Offline
trapper
K

Joined: May 2009
Champaign County, Ohio.
Copying a document well in no way whatsoever means that document is truthful. What a bizarre thought process.

Keith

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: KeithC] #8413385
06/03/25 01:42 PM
06/03/25 01:42 PM
Joined: Oct 2009
east central WI
K
k snow Offline
trapper
k snow  Offline
trapper
K

Joined: Oct 2009
east central WI
Originally Posted by KeithC
Copying a document well in no way whatsoever means that document is truthful. What a bizarre thought process.

Keith


C'mon, modern MSM says the exact same thing over and over and over. You mean it's NOT true?? LOL

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: k snow] #8413386
06/03/25 01:45 PM
06/03/25 01:45 PM
Joined: May 2009
Champaign County, Ohio.
K
KeithC Offline
trapper
KeithC  Offline
trapper
K

Joined: May 2009
Champaign County, Ohio.
Originally Posted by k snow
Originally Posted by KeithC
Copying a document well in no way whatsoever means that document is truthful. What a bizarre thought process.

Keith


C'mon, modern MSM says the exact same thing over and over and over. You mean it's NOT true?? LOL


It doesn't mean it's not true. It means nothing to the veracity at all.

Keith

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413387
06/03/25 01:46 PM
06/03/25 01:46 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
T
TreedaBlackdog Offline
trapper
TreedaBlackdog  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
trusting brakes to stop a vehicle often is also a bizarre thought process if you don't get out and take off all wheels and check your brakes every time - or we can live in faith.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413389
06/03/25 01:51 PM
06/03/25 01:51 PM
Joined: Oct 2009
east central WI
K
k snow Offline
trapper
k snow  Offline
trapper
K

Joined: Oct 2009
east central WI
Keith, yes, I agree 100%. Just because the same story is repeated the same way over and over, simply means its the same story. If the story is factual is completely unrelated to how it is told, and retold. Like so many family "legends". Passed down through generations, some true, some not.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413390
06/03/25 01:53 PM
06/03/25 01:53 PM
Joined: Sep 2013
AK
F
FL cracker in AK Offline
trapper
FL cracker in AK  Offline
trapper
F

Joined: Sep 2013
AK
Interesting that not one archeological discovery has disproved the Bible, but many have been discovered that prove the Bible's accuracy. Many rivers, mountains, valleys, cities, kings, battles, even scribes and priests.


Psalm 34:6
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: KeithC] #8413391
06/03/25 01:53 PM
06/03/25 01:53 PM
Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
L
loosegoose Offline
trapper
loosegoose  Offline
trapper
L

Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
Originally Posted by KeithC
Copying a document well in no way whatsoever means that document is truthful. What a bizarre thought process.

Keith

This is true. I've also heard it said that we can use the Bible to verify the truthfulness of the Bible, or that the Bible proves itself to be true, which is also nonsense. If that were true, then we could also use Snow White and the 7 dwarves to prove that Snow White and the 7 dwarves is true.

Copying a document well over a long time period does mean, though, that we can eliminate the variable of a sort of "telephone game" thing where the text changes over time, and we can look at what we have today, and know that it's what the original document writers wrote, and that helps to understand the thought processes of the writers, and what they intended to say. Now, whether or not they were confused, lying, or actually believed what they wrote..............


Last edited by loosegoose; 06/03/25 01:54 PM.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: FL cracker in AK] #8413393
06/03/25 01:56 PM
06/03/25 01:56 PM
Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
L
loosegoose Offline
trapper
loosegoose  Offline
trapper
L

Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
Originally Posted by FL cracker in AK
Interesting that not one archeological discovery has disproved the Bible, but many have been discovered that prove the Bible's accuracy. Many rivers, mountains, valleys, cities, kings, battles, even scribes and priests.



Archeology has proven a lot of Biblical events that were previously thought to be myths true. But archeology also proves that mankind, and the world, has been around waaaaaaaaaay longer than 6000 years, which directly contradicts the Bible.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413397
06/03/25 02:04 PM
06/03/25 02:04 PM
Joined: May 2009
Champaign County, Ohio.
K
KeithC Offline
trapper
KeithC  Offline
trapper
K

Joined: May 2009
Champaign County, Ohio.
There's an entertaining genre of writing called Historical Fiction. In Historical Fiction pure fiction is merged with real people, places and events in time. It's generally an easier way to create a setting for the story being told, though good authors do a lot of research. Just because real people places and events are included doesn't make the work non-fiction.

Keith

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413398
06/03/25 02:05 PM
06/03/25 02:05 PM
Joined: Sep 2013
AK
F
FL cracker in AK Offline
trapper
FL cracker in AK  Offline
trapper
F

Joined: Sep 2013
AK
I put no faith in the dating methods of evolutionists. Their date for the age of the earth has changed from 10,000 years in the beginning of their religion, to 4.5 billion years old now... that's a pretty big variable.


Psalm 34:6
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413400
06/03/25 02:09 PM
06/03/25 02:09 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
McGrath, AK
W
white17 Offline

"General (Mr.Sunshine) Washington"
white17  Offline

"General (Mr.Sunshine) Washington"
W

Joined: Mar 2007
McGrath, AK
Originally Posted by Husky
I found this interesting. Thought you people that think the Bible is false would like to see this.
[Linked Image]



Once again I believe you don't understand what you are posting.

The last column..."Accuracy of Copies" does not mean that the content is true or accurate. It only means.......as Keith has pointed out .....that the 'copy' is 99.5% accurate compared to the source that was copied. I has nothing to do with validity or facts.
Case in point is the inclusion of Homer's Iliad. This is mythology about the Wars between Troy and Greece. It includes the intervention of the 'gods' Apollo, Athena, and Achilles. It is obviously not factual in that aspect..........but it was copied fairly well.


Mean As Nails
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: loosegoose] #8413402
06/03/25 02:20 PM
06/03/25 02:20 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
T
TreedaBlackdog Offline
trapper
TreedaBlackdog  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
Originally Posted by loosegoose
Originally Posted by FL cracker in AK
Interesting that not one archeological discovery has disproved the Bible, but many have been discovered that prove the Bible's accuracy. Many rivers, mountains, valleys, cities, kings, battles, even scribes and priests.



Archeology has proven a lot of Biblical events that were previously thought to be myths true. But archeology also proves that mankind, and the world, has been around waaaaaaaaaay longer than 6000 years, which directly contradicts the Bible.



How has archeology proven any contradictions to the Bible? Dating of items has been shown to be in error. For example, million year old fossils(not truly) can be made in a few minutes with some heat and pressure - then carbon dated and come back millions of years old - when you just watched them being made.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413412
06/03/25 02:34 PM
06/03/25 02:34 PM
Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
L
loosegoose Offline
trapper
loosegoose  Offline
trapper
L

Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
So lets start with what the Bible says.......

1. The Bible says in Genesis 1 that Adam was the first man.

2. In Luke 3:23-38, a complete genealogy from Jesus back to Adam is given, it has 77 generations by my count.

3. The ages of several of the folks listed in that genealogy are listed in various places in the old testament, and after the flood the Bible says that humans can only live a maximum of 120 years.



If all three of those pieces of information are true, then man has only been around for 6000ish years. IF man has been around for more than 6000ish years, then at least one of the following must be true.......



1. Some guy named Adam that lived 6000ish years ago wasn't the first man, contradicting Genesis 1

2. The genealogy is incorrect, and there were alot more generations between adam and Jesus, contradicting Luke 3:23-38

3. The ages of the folks listed is wrong and/or some folks after the flood lived waaaaaaay longer than 120 years.


We know that's not true though. Humans have been around more than 6000 years. We've been in North America alone for at least 14,000 years, some estimates say up to 25,000 years.

Last edited by loosegoose; 06/03/25 02:38 PM.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413417
06/03/25 02:46 PM
06/03/25 02:46 PM
Joined: Oct 2013
East of the Mason-Dixon Line
DelawareRob Offline
trapper
DelawareRob  Offline
trapper

Joined: Oct 2013
East of the Mason-Dixon Line
[Linked Image]


Stop over cooking your meat! It isn’t gamey, it’s over cooked!

Gordon Ramsey, maybe…
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413432
06/03/25 03:28 PM
06/03/25 03:28 PM
Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
L
loosegoose Offline
trapper
loosegoose  Offline
trapper
L

Joined: Jun 2018
Beatrice, NE
One other thing to add before I get......I know that many Christians believe that the Genesis creation story isn't meant to be literal, that its a metaphor. The problem with that is that if that were the case, then the genealogy in Luke wouldn't be correct. If the genealogy in Luke is correct, then Adam as the first man must be taken literally. And if Adam wasn't the first man, then the genealogy given in Luke is wrong. The genealogy points to the creation story, or at least the part about adam being the first man, as literal and not metaphorical.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: DelawareRob] #8413437
06/03/25 03:31 PM
06/03/25 03:31 PM
Joined: Jan 2023
Pennsylvania
elsmasho82 Offline
trapper
elsmasho82  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2023
Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by DelawareRob
[Linked Image]



grin

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413441
06/03/25 03:37 PM
06/03/25 03:37 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
D
danny clifton Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
danny clifton  Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
D

Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
Husky, if your wrestling with whether or not the religion you've been taught is real, trapperman is not the place to do research.


Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: danny clifton] #8413451
06/03/25 04:04 PM
06/03/25 04:04 PM
Joined: Jan 2023
Pennsylvania
elsmasho82 Offline
trapper
elsmasho82  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2023
Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by danny clifton
Husky, if your wrestling with whether or not the religion you've been taught is real, trapperman is not the place to do research.



This is true. These threads give me an instant knot in my stomach.
It’s not spirituality and faith that upsets me; it’s the constant battling over who has it all figured out. I certainly don’t.
When something like this is shoved down your throat all your life, you get an aversion to it. Husky I hope you can find peace in your own spirituality. smile

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: danny clifton] #8413453
06/03/25 04:05 PM
06/03/25 04:05 PM
Joined: Oct 2013
East of the Mason-Dixon Line
DelawareRob Offline
trapper
DelawareRob  Offline
trapper

Joined: Oct 2013
East of the Mason-Dixon Line
Originally Posted by danny clifton
Husky, if your wrestling with whether or not the religion you've been taught is real, trapperman is not the place to do research.



Heck, it isn’t the place to do research on how you’ve been taught to trap sometimes. Lol


Stop over cooking your meat! It isn’t gamey, it’s over cooked!

Gordon Ramsey, maybe…
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413462
06/03/25 04:30 PM
06/03/25 04:30 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Rochester, MN
Teacher Offline
trapper
Teacher  Offline
trapper

Joined: Nov 2010
Rochester, MN
I’ve always thought the Bible was a history of the times, as written by those who lived it, as they remembered it. My big issues have been with its interpretation by priests, ministers, bishops, rabbis, popes, prophets, professors and the like. Everyone has an opinion of who and what their God is. Everyone wants me to believe what they say is what the Bible contains. Every religion thinks it is the true way, and their interpretation is the only way.

I see all religions like trapping: Everything has qualifiers. No one lure catches them all. The wind and rain play havoc with the best laid plans. It boils down to the trapper and individual studying the situation, getting comfortable with the interpretation, and laying steel in a way that works for them.

Now, there are some universal truths in trapping.
1. A trap left in the truck doesn’t catch anything.
2. Otters are non-existent in Washington DC so don’t put your trap in the middle of a cement intersection.
3. Catching your aunt’s favorite cat will guarantee you a dope-slap or even worse.
4. Flooding makes it hard to stay clean.
5. Wet, muddy fur guarantees a low offer by the fur buyer.
6. Tainting bait in the basement makes loved ones less loving.

There are some universal truths about biblical stuff, too.
1. If you don’t open the Bible, you’ll never learn it’s contents.
2. The Bible was written by those who could read and write.
3. The Bible was written based on memories, and memories aren’t always accurate.
4. No one living today was present when the miracles performed by Jesus were done. We’re taking the memories, passed thru generations of interpretations, as truth.
5. The Bible is, essentially, a history book.

History tends to be written by the victors. Some of it is probably accurate but considering how much beverage was consumed from lead goblets, even that is suspect. If someone wants to believe in the words of the Bible, I’m all for it. But the way I see it, no book is perfect.


Never too old to learn
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413491
06/03/25 05:55 PM
06/03/25 05:55 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
South Ga - Almost Florida
Swamp Wolf Offline
trapper
Swamp Wolf  Offline
trapper

Joined: Apr 2009
South Ga - Almost Florida
Every one of us will find out the truth one day.


Thank God For Your Blessings!
Never Half-Arse Anything!

Resource Protection Service

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413492
06/03/25 05:57 PM
06/03/25 05:57 PM
Joined: Dec 2024
North Pole, Alaska
Husky Offline OP
trapper
Husky  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Dec 2024
North Pole, Alaska
Teacher, if the Bible is a history book, how do you explain the Book of Revelation? That is about future times not past events.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: loosegoose] #8413495
06/03/25 06:03 PM
06/03/25 06:03 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
Originally Posted by loosegoose
So lets start with what the Bible says.......

1. The Bible says in Genesis 1 that Adam was the first man.

2. In Luke 3:23-38, a complete genealogy from Jesus back to Adam is given, it has 77 generations by my count.

3. The ages of several of the folks listed in that genealogy are listed in various places in the old testament, and after the flood the Bible says that humans can only live a maximum of 120 years.



If all three of those pieces of information are true, then man has only been around for 6000ish years. IF man has been around for more than 6000ish years, then at least one of the following must be true.......



1. Some guy named Adam that lived 6000ish years ago wasn't the first man, contradicting Genesis 1

2. The genealogy is incorrect, and there were alot more generations between adam and Jesus, contradicting Luke 3:23-38

3. The ages of the folks listed is wrong and/or some folks after the flood lived waaaaaaay longer than 120 years.


We know that's not true though. Humans have been around more than 6000 years. We've been in North America alone for at least 14,000 years, some estimates say up to 25,000 years.

The genealogy, if incomplete, doesn't mean it's incorrect. You misunderstand the mindset of the writers. Our modern perception is " just the facts, ma'am. " They didn't necessarily think that way.


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Swamp Wolf] #8413510
06/03/25 06:22 PM
06/03/25 06:22 PM
Joined: May 2009
Champaign County, Ohio.
K
KeithC Offline
trapper
KeithC  Offline
trapper
K

Joined: May 2009
Champaign County, Ohio.
Originally Posted by Swamp Wolf
Every one of us will find out the truth one day.


I hope so, but nobody knows that is true either. Some people believe that a great many don't.

Keith

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: elsmasho82] #8413511
06/03/25 06:25 PM
06/03/25 06:25 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
NWWA/AZ
Vinke Offline
trapper
Vinke  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
NWWA/AZ
Originally Posted by elsmasho82
Originally Posted by danny clifton
Husky, if your wrestling with whether or not the religion you've been taught is real, trapperman is not the place to do research.



This is true. These threads give me an instant knot in my stomach.
It’s not spirituality and faith that upsets me; it’s the constant battling over who has it all figured out. I certainly don’t.
When something like this is shoved down your throat all your life, you get an aversion to it. Husky I hope you can find peace in your own spirituality. smile


I will pray for you…..


Ant Man/ Marty 2028
just put your ear to the ground , and follow along

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413515
06/03/25 06:31 PM
06/03/25 06:31 PM
Joined: Dec 2024
AR
J
J Staton Offline
trapper
J Staton  Offline
trapper
J

Joined: Dec 2024
AR
I have faith in it's reliability. I don't outright reject it, nor do I have to put my "hand in the wound" to believe it. That's just my 2 cents.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413529
06/03/25 06:49 PM
06/03/25 06:49 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
Savell Offline
"Wilbur"
Savell  Offline
"Wilbur"

Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
…. I always thought it was wild that Jesus would go into a lepor colony only heal a couple of them …. I bet the ones left were po’d lol


Insert profound nonsense here
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413530
06/03/25 06:51 PM
06/03/25 06:51 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Rochester, MN
Teacher Offline
trapper
Teacher  Offline
trapper

Joined: Nov 2010
Rochester, MN
Bishop John Shelby Spong (maybe he was an arch-bishop) made an interesting observation in one of his books. For the record, I only read one. In it, he said in the time of Jesus, heaven was thought to be at the level of the clouds. Since then, we’ve figured out how to see 100,000 light years away. Does that mean heaven moved? Or just our concept of it now that we can see further?

I’m still not convinced the earth and all we know took 7-days to make. Or that the sea parted due to a miracle. That may have worked when people didn’t understand the process of tsunamis and tectonic plate movements. Ask the people in the southern states that just went thru flooding if heavy rains aren’t a possibility.

A lack of knowledge doesn’t a miracle make. So says Yoda.


Never too old to learn
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413531
06/03/25 06:52 PM
06/03/25 06:52 PM
Joined: Nov 2024
Alaska
A
AK Timber Tramp Offline
trapper
AK Timber Tramp  Offline
trapper
A

Joined: Nov 2024
Alaska
I think the kid just likes to stir the pot. He doesn’t seem to be questioning his beliefs, so much as looking for someone to disagree so he can defend his religion to quell his boredom. Not saying I don’t dip into the whiskey bottle and look for an argument now and again lol

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413538
06/03/25 06:59 PM
06/03/25 06:59 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Very SE Nebraska
G
Gary Benson Offline
trapper
Gary Benson  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Dec 2006
Very SE Nebraska
There was the original King James version...then all the 230 some Christian sectors changed the wording to suit themselves. Mankind is good at that.


Life ain't supposed to be easy.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: AK Timber Tramp] #8413540
06/03/25 07:01 PM
06/03/25 07:01 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
Savell Offline
"Wilbur"
Savell  Offline
"Wilbur"

Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
Originally Posted by AK Timber Tramp
I think the kid just likes to stir the pot. He doesn’t seem to be questioning his beliefs, so much as looking for someone to disagree so he can defend his religion to quell his boredom. Not saying I don’t dip into the whiskey bottle and look for an argument now and again lol


…. You’re probably right…. I liked it when he made another account to talk in his own posts …. That was pretty funny lol


Insert profound nonsense here
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413541
06/03/25 07:03 PM
06/03/25 07:03 PM
Joined: Oct 2013
East of the Mason-Dixon Line
DelawareRob Offline
trapper
DelawareRob  Offline
trapper

Joined: Oct 2013
East of the Mason-Dixon Line
lol, that is funny.


Stop over cooking your meat! It isn’t gamey, it’s over cooked!

Gordon Ramsey, maybe…
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Teacher] #8413546
06/03/25 07:05 PM
06/03/25 07:05 PM
Joined: Feb 2015
Iowa
T
trapdog1 Offline
trapper
trapdog1  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Feb 2015
Iowa
Originally Posted by Teacher
I’ve always thought the Bible was a history of the times, as written by those who lived it, as they remembered it. My big issues have been with its interpretation by priests, ministers, bishops, rabbis, popes, prophets, professors and the like. Everyone has an opinion of who and what their God is. Everyone wants me to believe what they say is what the Bible contains. Every religion thinks it is the true way, and their interpretation is the only way.

I see all religions like trapping: Everything has qualifiers. No one lure catches them all. The wind and rain play havoc with the best laid plans. It boils down to the trapper and individual studying the situation, getting comfortable with the interpretation, and laying steel in a way that works for them.

Now, there are some universal truths in trapping.
1. A trap left in the truck doesn’t catch anything.
2. Otters are non-existent in Washington DC so don’t put your trap in the middle of a cement intersection.
3. Catching your aunt’s favorite cat will guarantee you a dope-slap or even worse.
4. Flooding makes it hard to stay clean.
5. Wet, muddy fur guarantees a low offer by the fur buyer.
6. Tainting bait in the basement makes loved ones less loving.

There are some universal truths about biblical stuff, too.
1. If you don’t open the Bible, you’ll never learn it’s contents.
2. The Bible was written by those who could read and write.
3. The Bible was written based on memories, and memories aren’t always accurate.
4. No one living today was present when the miracles performed by Jesus were done. We’re taking the memories, passed thru generations of interpretations, as truth.
5. The Bible is, essentially, a history book.

History tends to be written by the victors. Some of it is probably accurate but considering how much beverage was consumed from lead goblets, even that is suspect. If someone wants to believe in the words of the Bible, I’m all for it. But the way I see it, no book is perfect.


This is a purty good analysis, Teacher.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Savell] #8413547
06/03/25 07:05 PM
06/03/25 07:05 PM
Joined: Nov 2024
Alaska
A
AK Timber Tramp Offline
trapper
AK Timber Tramp  Offline
trapper
A

Joined: Nov 2024
Alaska
Originally Posted by Savell
Originally Posted by AK Timber Tramp
I think the kid just likes to stir the pot. He doesn’t seem to be questioning his beliefs, so much as looking for someone to disagree so he can defend his religion to quell his boredom. Not saying I don’t dip into the whiskey bottle and look for an argument now and again lol


…. You’re probably right…. I liked it when he made another account to talk in his own posts …. That was pretty funny lol

That was pretty good lol.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Teacher] #8413563
06/03/25 07:22 PM
06/03/25 07:22 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
Originally Posted by Teacher
Bishop John Shelby Spong (maybe he was an arch-bishop) made an interesting observation in one of his books. For the record, I only read one. In it, he said in the time of Jesus, heaven was thought to be at the level of the clouds. Since then, we’ve figured out how to see 100,000 light years away. Does that mean heaven moved? Or just our concept of it now that we can see further?

I’m still not convinced the earth and all we know took 7-days to make. Or that the sea parted due to a miracle. That may have worked when people didn’t understand the process of tsunamis and tectonic plate movements. Ask the people in the southern states that just went thru flooding if heavy rains aren’t a possibility.

A lack of knowledge doesn’t a miracle make. So says Yoda.

Heaven was never in the sky. That's the physical heavens. It's not a place in the clouds, and hells not inside the earth. When people die thier bodies don't float up or go down. It's a spiritual reality. Think another dimension right here but not visible to our physical eyesight.


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413569
06/03/25 07:31 PM
06/03/25 07:31 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
Savell Offline
"Wilbur"
Savell  Offline
"Wilbur"

Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
… there’d be a whole bunch lepors with their flesh rotting begging to be healed … Jesus over there spinning a bottle or something

… yall know the ones that didn’t get picked were fit to be tied….gauratee it lol

… the Levantine lottery or something lol


Insert profound nonsense here
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Savell] #8413573
06/03/25 07:38 PM
06/03/25 07:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2023
Pennsylvania
elsmasho82 Offline
trapper
elsmasho82  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2023
Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by Savell
… there’d be a whole bunch lepors with their flesh rotting begging to be healed … Jesus over there spinning a bottle or something

… yall know the ones that didn’t get picked were fit to be tied….gauratee it lol


… the Levantine lottery or something lol


You are reading my mind. Who was so blessed as to feel Jesus’ touch and be healed. Everyone else came to the party too late!
shocked

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413577
06/03/25 07:43 PM
06/03/25 07:43 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
Savell Offline
"Wilbur"
Savell  Offline
"Wilbur"

Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
… there’s probably a reason… I just always thought it sucked for the rest of the colony

… maybe the winner found a golden ticket in a loaf of unleavened bread or something?


Insert profound nonsense here
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Savell] #8413590
06/03/25 08:15 PM
06/03/25 08:15 PM
Joined: May 2009
Champaign County, Ohio.
K
KeithC Offline
trapper
KeithC  Offline
trapper
K

Joined: May 2009
Champaign County, Ohio.
Originally Posted by Savell
… there’s probably a reason… I just always thought it sucked for the rest of the colony

… maybe the winner found a golden ticket in a loaf of unleavened bread or something?


Was Judas Slugworth?

Keith

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413624
06/03/25 08:49 PM
06/03/25 08:49 PM
Joined: Dec 2024
AR
J
J Staton Offline
trapper
J Staton  Offline
trapper
J

Joined: Dec 2024
AR
Maybe those lepers didn't believe....

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: J Staton] #8413628
06/03/25 08:52 PM
06/03/25 08:52 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
Savell Offline
"Wilbur"
Savell  Offline
"Wilbur"

Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
Originally Posted by J Staton
Maybe those lepers didn't believe....


… at that point of decay I’d imagine they’d believe in anything that might heal them

… but you could be right…. I don’t know anything for fact


Insert profound nonsense here
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413635
06/03/25 08:57 PM
06/03/25 08:57 PM
Joined: Jul 2016
Wisconsin
B
Bear Tracker Offline
trapper
Bear Tracker  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Jul 2016
Wisconsin
How many versions of the Bible are there? I googled it quickly some estimates up to 900, hundreds for sure. So does not what version you read affect what you believe?

Last edited by Bear Tracker; 06/03/25 09:00 PM.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Bear Tracker] #8413642
06/03/25 09:00 PM
06/03/25 09:00 PM
Joined: Oct 2013
East of the Mason-Dixon Line
DelawareRob Offline
trapper
DelawareRob  Offline
trapper

Joined: Oct 2013
East of the Mason-Dixon Line
Originally Posted by Bear Tracker
How many versions of the Bible are there?


[Linked Image]


From google.


Stop over cooking your meat! It isn’t gamey, it’s over cooked!

Gordon Ramsey, maybe…
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Bear Tracker] #8413712
06/03/25 10:09 PM
06/03/25 10:09 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
Originally Posted by Bear Tracker
How many versions of the Bible are there? I googled it quickly some estimates up to 900, hundreds for sure. So does not what version you read affect what you believe?

Unless it's some modern version that deviates from the original intention, the message is the same. People go on about the catholic vs Protestant versions, but there's nothing different that really should affect belief. I've read both.


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: PAskinner] #8413779
06/03/25 11:08 PM
06/03/25 11:08 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
East-Central Wisconsin
B
bblwi Offline
trapper
bblwi  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Dec 2006
East-Central Wisconsin
Protestent Bible has 66 books the Catholic Bible has 73 books. all the additional books are in the Old Testement. The Gospel of Thomas fouond in Egypt is not in any of the Bibles. One of our Bible studies several years ago studied that Gospel.

Bryce

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413780
06/03/25 11:10 PM
06/03/25 11:10 PM
Joined: Oct 2013
East of the Mason-Dixon Line
DelawareRob Offline
trapper
DelawareRob  Offline
trapper

Joined: Oct 2013
East of the Mason-Dixon Line
Lol


Stop over cooking your meat! It isn’t gamey, it’s over cooked!

Gordon Ramsey, maybe…
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413784
06/03/25 11:22 PM
06/03/25 11:22 PM
Joined: Mar 2014
Central Texas
C
Chancey Offline
trapper
Chancey  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Mar 2014
Central Texas
Is the Book of Enoch or the Book of Giants in the Catholic Bible? Or any of the other Books mentioned in the OT? I need to get a good Catholic Bible, which one is the best?

Reason I ask is that I have two Qurans; one of them modern and one very old one I picked up. They are very different in their translations.


Resident Conspiracy Theorist
Accused Moron, Nazi, Low IQ, Putin Fan Boy, and Obama Clone
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Chancey] #8413800
06/04/25 12:18 AM
06/04/25 12:18 AM
Joined: May 2009
Champaign County, Ohio.
K
KeithC Offline
trapper
KeithC  Offline
trapper
K

Joined: May 2009
Champaign County, Ohio.
Originally Posted by Chancey
Is the Book of Enoch or the Book of Giants in the Catholic Bible? Or any of the other Books mentioned in the OT? I need to get a good Catholic Bible, which one is the best?

Reason I ask is that I have two Qurans; one of them modern and one very old one I picked up. They are very different in their translations.


The Catholic Bible was compiled in the 4th century. The Protestant Bibles are all.derived from it. The Book of Enoch and The Book of Giants were rejected by the Catholic Church because they did not agree with church teachings.

Keith

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413824
06/04/25 02:32 AM
06/04/25 02:32 AM
Joined: Jul 2024
IL
NorthwesternYote Offline
trapper
NorthwesternYote  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jul 2024
IL
Originally Posted by Husky
And remember, no one doubts Plato, or Aristotle, or Homer ever lived, so why do people doubt that Jesus lived when is much more evidence for his life than the others?

I've heard plenty of modern historians who think Homer is a legendary figure and believe the Iliad and Odyssey were written by different authors.

But I am more inclined to accept the New Testament books as historical accounts than I am with the book of Genesis; they were written much closer in time to the events they attested to.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Chancey] #8413825
06/04/25 02:49 AM
06/04/25 02:49 AM
Joined: Jul 2024
IL
NorthwesternYote Offline
trapper
NorthwesternYote  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jul 2024
IL
Originally Posted by Chancey
Is the Book of Enoch or the Book of Giants in the Catholic Bible? Or any of the other Books mentioned in the OT? I need to get a good Catholic Bible, which one is the best?

Reason I ask is that I have two Qurans; one of them modern and one very old one I picked up. They are very different in their translations.

The Book of Enoch is not in the Catholic Bible, but some Oriental Orthodox churches accept it.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413861
06/04/25 07:29 AM
06/04/25 07:29 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
D
danny clifton Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
danny clifton  Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
D

Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
What about these stories?




Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Teacher] #8413867
06/04/25 07:54 AM
06/04/25 07:54 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
T
TreedaBlackdog Offline
trapper
TreedaBlackdog  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
Originally Posted by Teacher
Bishop John Shelby Spong (maybe he was an arch-bishop) made an interesting observation in one of his books. For the record, I only read one. In it, he said in the time of Jesus, heaven was thought to be at the level of the clouds. Since then, we’ve figured out how to see 100,000 light years away. Does that mean heaven moved? Or just our concept of it now that we can see further?

I’m still not convinced the earth and all we know took 7-days to make. Or that the sea parted due to a miracle. That may have worked when people didn’t understand the process of tsunamis and tectonic plate movements. Ask the people in the southern states that just went thru flooding if heavy rains aren’t a possibility.

A lack of knowledge doesn’t a miracle make. So says Yoda.




It didn't take 7 days - only 6.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Teacher] #8413873
06/04/25 08:09 AM
06/04/25 08:09 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
T
TreedaBlackdog Offline
trapper
TreedaBlackdog  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
Originally Posted by Teacher
. Or that the sea parted due to a miracle.

A lack of knowledge doesn’t a miracle make. So says Yoda.



So the real miracle was that an entire army was dumb enough to drown in the parted sea? A nation of over a million people could pass on dry land and then the army pursuing them is drowned right behind them - what knowledge led to this? You are correct - lack of knowledge doesn't make a miracle - God does.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413876
06/04/25 08:13 AM
06/04/25 08:13 AM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
Gospel of Thomas is a gnostic text, not Canon because it's fake.,


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413932
06/04/25 09:39 AM
06/04/25 09:39 AM
Joined: Nov 2010
Rochester, MN
Teacher Offline
trapper
Teacher  Offline
trapper

Joined: Nov 2010
Rochester, MN
There’s nothing stopping you from believing the Bible, Quran, the analects of Taoism, Torah or whatever word for word. In this country, it is your right to do so. I’m more of a ‘show me the facts’ sort of guy. To the people who believe a million people passed thru the opened sea, was there a count of bodies before or after to show it was a million or are you taking this on faith?

I like the leper observations above. ‘Can’t believe all the others in the leper colony weren’t a little put off by not being chosen to be cured. To me, these stories are metaphors used for teaching purposes. No one would have believed, or understood deeper explanations so stories were used to pass information along.


Never too old to learn
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413947
06/04/25 10:14 AM
06/04/25 10:14 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
T
TreedaBlackdog Offline
trapper
TreedaBlackdog  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
Do you stomp the ground with a stick before you place your foot down every step? Or do you have faith in gravity, the ground will be solid enough to support you?

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: PAskinner] #8413949
06/04/25 10:17 AM
06/04/25 10:17 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Iowa
M
mink99 Offline
trapper
mink99  Offline
trapper
M

Joined: Jan 2007
Iowa
Originally Posted by PAskinner
Gospel of Thomas is a gnostic text, not Canon because it's fake.,


I believe the book of Enoch was deemed fake also.


ITA, NTA, FTA
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: white marlin] #8413951
06/04/25 10:20 AM
06/04/25 10:20 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
T
Trapper7 Offline
trapper
Trapper7  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
Originally Posted by white marlin
Originally Posted by wetdog
Why do you think Judus had to kiss Jesus?
So the guards knew which Jesus to arrest, because there was more than one in the garden that night


curious how you know there was more than one Jesus present in that time and place...

could it be that Judas had to kiss Jesus because the soldiers didn't know Him personally? He was surrounded by 12 other guys.

That is the most reasonable reason, IMO.


The first bottles of Coca Cola contained 3.5 grams of cocaine. That's how our grandparents were able to walk to school uphill both ways in the snow.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: loosegoose] #8413953
06/04/25 10:26 AM
06/04/25 10:26 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
T
Trapper7 Offline
trapper
Trapper7  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
Originally Posted by loosegoose
Even most secular historians agree that Jesus was a real person that lived in Israel about 2000 years ago. What they disagree on is whether or not he was the Son of God that performed miracles and died and came back to life.

Not according to the Jewish historian, Josephus. He wrote that he was not a follower of Jesus, but there were rumors that Jesus healed the sick and performed miracles.


The first bottles of Coca Cola contained 3.5 grams of cocaine. That's how our grandparents were able to walk to school uphill both ways in the snow.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413954
06/04/25 10:29 AM
06/04/25 10:29 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
Savell Offline
"Wilbur"
Savell  Offline
"Wilbur"

Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
^^^^^ Josephus lol

[Linked Image]


Insert profound nonsense here
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8413957
06/04/25 10:32 AM
06/04/25 10:32 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
T
TreedaBlackdog Offline
trapper
TreedaBlackdog  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
You don't think all those watching outside the Ark were a bit put off too? What about the family members of those turned into pillars of salt? How about Josephs brothers who threw him in a pit? Many, many will not be chosen and many will not choose Christ. He stands at the door knocking and many will not answer.......some of you think you are in control and have difficulty comprehending faith but yet you walk daily in your own faith of finding relief at the bottom of a bottle or a pill being prescribed or a job or finances. I have never met a drunk or an addict or a millionaire or someone perceived as having it all together that truly has peace that passes all understanding - without Christ. Many of you are truly unlearned in the Bible and have never put Gods Word to the test. Those of us that have, know He will never forsake us nor leave us no matter what life looks like to others - in that, my faith in Jesus Christ grows and I pray others research it for themselves. Become vulnerable - open up and cry out to the Lord and allow Him to speak to you through His Word. Challenge Him and see He is good. Don't take my word for it - gain your own experience, I can not grow your faith - only you.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: TreedaBlackdog] #8413972
06/04/25 11:09 AM
06/04/25 11:09 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
T
Trapper7 Offline
trapper
Trapper7  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
Originally Posted by TreedaBlackdog
You don't think all those watching outside the Ark were a bit put off too? What about the family members of those turned into pillars of salt? How about Josephs brothers who threw him in a pit? Many, many will not be chosen and many will not choose Christ. He stands at the door knocking and many will not answer.......some of you think you are in control and have difficulty comprehending faith but yet you walk daily in your own faith of finding relief at the bottom of a bottle or a pill being prescribed or a job or finances. I have never met a drunk or an addict or a millionaire or someone perceived as having it all together that truly has peace that passes all understanding - without Christ. Many of you are truly unlearned in the Bible and have never put Gods Word to the test. Those of us that have, know He will never forsake us nor leave us no matter what life looks like to others - in that, my faith in Jesus Christ grows and I pray others research it for themselves. Become vulnerable - open up and cry out to the Lord and allow Him to speak to you through His Word. Challenge Him and see He is good. Don't take my word for it - gain your own experience, I can not grow your faith - only you.

Very well put. I hear you explaining why you believe what you believe. Everyone has a free choice as to what they want to believe. If they choose to believe, that's wonderful. If not, that's OK too. It's not your problem and I feel the same way.

Reminds me of something liberal Bill Maher once said, "The difference between Muslims and Christians is: Christians don't kill you if you don't convert to their religion."


The first bottles of Coca Cola contained 3.5 grams of cocaine. That's how our grandparents were able to walk to school uphill both ways in the snow.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: mink99] #8414000
06/04/25 12:08 PM
06/04/25 12:08 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
Originally Posted by mink99
Originally Posted by PAskinner
Gospel of Thomas is a gnostic text, not Canon because it's fake.,


I believe the book of Enoch was deemed fake also.

I think there's actually two books.
I kinda think God is big enough to include what he wants in the Canon.


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8414014
06/04/25 12:34 PM
06/04/25 12:34 PM
Joined: Dec 2024
North Pole, Alaska
Husky Offline OP
trapper
Husky  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Dec 2024
North Pole, Alaska
God has presented every one of us with a full pardon for all of our sins. We all have the opportunity to accept that pardon if we want. The sad thing is there will be more people that decline the pardon than accept it. Mathew 7:13-14 says, “ Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat:
Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.

In the end we all have an option, heaven or (This word is unacceptable on Trapperman). I pray you choose heaven.
No one knows how long our live will be. James 4 describes our life as a vapor that appears for a little time and then vanishes away. Don’t wait.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: KeithC] #8414079
06/04/25 02:40 PM
06/04/25 02:40 PM
Joined: May 2008
NW Oklahoma
O
Okie Farmer Offline
trapper
Okie Farmer  Offline
trapper
O

Joined: May 2008
NW Oklahoma
Originally Posted by KeithC
Originally Posted by Chancey
Is the Book of Enoch or the Book of Giants in the Catholic Bible? Or any of the other Books mentioned in the OT? I need to get a good Catholic Bible, which one is the best?

Reason I ask is that I have two Qurans; one of them modern and one very old one I picked up. They are very different in their translations.


The Catholic Bible was compiled in the 4th century. The Protestant Bibles are all.derived from it. The Book of Enoch and The Book of Giants were rejected by the Catholic Church because they did not agree with church teachings.

Keith


It has been translated to benefit the translators goals. Just like pagan traditions became Christmas and Easter to get pegans converted. But all hallows eve is bad

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8414080
06/04/25 02:42 PM
06/04/25 02:42 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Rochester, MN
Teacher Offline
trapper
Teacher  Offline
trapper

Joined: Nov 2010
Rochester, MN
We are given an opportunity. But opportunity means choice. Just because you chose your way, doesn’t mean your way needs to be mine. And vice versa.


Never too old to learn
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Teacher] #8414100
06/04/25 03:34 PM
06/04/25 03:34 PM
Joined: Dec 2024
North Pole, Alaska
Husky Offline OP
trapper
Husky  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Dec 2024
North Pole, Alaska
Originally Posted by Teacher
We are given an opportunity. But opportunity means choice. Just because you chose your way, doesn’t mean your way needs to be mine. And vice versa.


Very true

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Teacher] #8414188
06/04/25 05:52 PM
06/04/25 05:52 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
T
Trapper7 Offline
trapper
Trapper7  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
Originally Posted by Teacher
We are given an opportunity. But opportunity means choice. Just because you chose your way, doesn’t mean your way needs to be mine. And vice versa.


Exactly.


The first bottles of Coca Cola contained 3.5 grams of cocaine. That's how our grandparents were able to walk to school uphill both ways in the snow.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8414409
06/04/25 09:24 PM
06/04/25 09:24 PM
Joined: Apr 2017
PA
L
lumberjack391 Offline
trapper
lumberjack391  Offline
trapper
L

Joined: Apr 2017
PA
Where is the link for the fake fossils dating millions of years old?

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: J Staton] #8414486
06/05/25 02:03 AM
06/05/25 02:03 AM
Joined: May 2016
Southern Illinois
F
Foxpaw Offline
trapper
Foxpaw  Offline
trapper
F

Joined: May 2016
Southern Illinois
Originally Posted by J Staton
Maybe those lepers didn't believe....


Then there was those 10 that was all healed, but only 1 returned to thank Jesus. Does that mean they weren't grateful or merely that they never took the time to return and thank him?

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: lumberjack391] #8414758
06/05/25 12:34 PM
06/05/25 12:34 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
T
Trapper7 Offline
trapper
Trapper7  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
Originally Posted by lumberjack391
Where is the link for the fake fossils dating millions of years old?

The earth existed long before man, as we know him today ever inhabited it. The first chapter of Genesis says that at the beginning of time, God created heaven and earth. We don't know when that was. Earth was an empty waste and darkness hung over the deep. The earth was water covered until God caused the waters to recede. Who knows how old the earth is? More than the approximately 5,000 years since the existence of the first man, Adam that's for sure.

There is no doubt that dinosaurs and other creatures existed on the earth millions of years ago. The fossils prove it. We also know something wiped them out totally. God seems to cleanse the earth with water (the flood of Noah). Is that what happened to the creatures that lived during the time of the dinosaurs? Many bible scholars seem to think there was more than one flood prior to the flood of Noah.

The bible says God was sorry he ever made man. Looking at the mess we have in the world today, I believe it.


The first bottles of Coca Cola contained 3.5 grams of cocaine. That's how our grandparents were able to walk to school uphill both ways in the snow.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8414760
06/05/25 12:37 PM
06/05/25 12:37 PM
Joined: Apr 2017
PA
L
lumberjack391 Offline
trapper
lumberjack391  Offline
trapper
L

Joined: Apr 2017
PA
I was just inquiring about the fake fossils.....and being dated millions of years old.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Trapper7] #8414764
06/05/25 12:39 PM
06/05/25 12:39 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
T
Trapper7 Offline
trapper
Trapper7  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
Originally Posted by Trapper7
Originally Posted by lumberjack391
Where is the link for the fake fossils dating millions of years old?

The earth existed long before man, as we know him today ever inhabited it. The first chapter of Genesis says that at the beginning of time, God created heaven and earth. We don't know when that was. Earth was an empty waste and darkness hung over the deep. The earth was water covered until God caused the waters to recede. Who knows how old the earth is? More than the approximately 5,000 years since the existence of the first man, Adam that's for sure.

There is no doubt that dinosaurs and other creatures existed on the earth millions of years ago. The fossils prove it. We also know something wiped them out totally. God seems to cleanse the earth with water (the flood of Noah). Is that what happened to the creatures that lived during the time of the dinosaurs? Many bible scholars seem to think there was more than one flood prior to the flood of Noah.

The bible says God was sorry he ever made man. Looking at the mess we have in the world today, I believe it.

One other thing is once when I was elk hunting in Colorado we found sea shells near the top of this one mountain. They crumbled when you picked them up. The rancher whose land we were hunting on said he had seen shells on top before too. How did they get there unless the water was that high at one time?


The first bottles of Coca Cola contained 3.5 grams of cocaine. That's how our grandparents were able to walk to school uphill both ways in the snow.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8414767
06/05/25 12:40 PM
06/05/25 12:40 PM
Joined: Dec 2024
North Pole, Alaska
Husky Offline OP
trapper
Husky  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Dec 2024
North Pole, Alaska
There was only one worldwide flood. A lot of Christians think the climate change after the Flood was unsustainable for dinosaurs, which caused them to die off.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8414770
06/05/25 12:43 PM
06/05/25 12:43 PM
Joined: Dec 2024
North Pole, Alaska
Husky Offline OP
trapper
Husky  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Dec 2024
North Pole, Alaska
An interesting question: what do people think of the Bible’s prophecy that Israel would be reestablished? In the entire history of mankind no other nation has been completely destroyed and spread throughout the world and then showed back up again.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8414783
06/05/25 12:52 PM
06/05/25 12:52 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
NC
Buzzard Offline
trapper
Buzzard  Offline
trapper

Joined: Apr 2009
NC
Words from the past from my favorite author.....

Never ever discuss politics, religion, and red headed women

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8414787
06/05/25 01:00 PM
06/05/25 01:00 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
coastal ny
G
gcs Offline
trapper
gcs  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Dec 2006
coastal ny
wink

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8414853
06/05/25 02:29 PM
06/05/25 02:29 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
Originally Posted by Husky
An interesting question: what do people think of the Bible’s prophecy that Israel would be reestablished? In the entire history of mankind no other nation has been completely destroyed and spread throughout the world and then showed back up again.

What verse are you thinking of? Seems to me that already happened.


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: PAskinner] #8415032
06/05/25 06:08 PM
06/05/25 06:08 PM
Joined: Dec 2024
North Pole, Alaska
Husky Offline OP
trapper
Husky  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Dec 2024
North Pole, Alaska
Originally Posted by PAskinner
Originally Posted by Husky
An interesting question: what do people think of the Bible’s prophecy that Israel would be reestablished? In the entire history of mankind no other nation has been completely destroyed and spread throughout the world and then showed back up again.

What verse are you thinking of? Seems to me that already happened.


It already happened. They can be found in Isaiah 11:12, Jeremiah 30:1-38:22, Romans 11, and a few others. It’s things like that being correctly prophesied that make me wonder why people doubt the Bible. No other book in the world has ever come close to being that accurate in the past or, for then, future events.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8415133
06/05/25 09:14 PM
06/05/25 09:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Alaska and Washington State
W
waggler Online content
trapper
waggler  Online Content
trapper
W

Joined: Jan 2008
Alaska and Washington State
I'd say that most of the translations, will get the job done; with the exception of "interpertations/translations" done by particular sects that introduce their bias (wacky) beliefs.

However, the most accurate manuscripts are the oldest ones, preferably in their original languages, such as Hebrew, Greek, or Aramaic. Problem is, you first need to learn those languages to read them. Therefore, most of us settle for second best.


"My life is better than your vacation"
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8415242
06/05/25 11:07 PM
06/05/25 11:07 PM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
Husky
What future prophesy or prophecies do you believe have yet to be fulfilled?


Christ is King
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8415243
06/05/25 11:08 PM
06/05/25 11:08 PM
Joined: Apr 2017
PA
L
lumberjack391 Offline
trapper
lumberjack391  Offline
trapper
L

Joined: Apr 2017
PA
Trapper7-Tectonics pushed the sea life up to the top. Scientists believe a huge meteor impact caused the demise of most prehistoric life. You must have mis-read me, I am looking for the link you had of fake fossils dating millions of years old.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8415254
06/05/25 11:39 PM
06/05/25 11:39 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
East-Central Wisconsin
B
bblwi Offline
trapper
bblwi  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Dec 2006
East-Central Wisconsin
Many of us credit God with creating the World and all that is in it, With that in mind we have virusus and bacterias that can mutate multiple times in a year. If God created all life then he created the ability for life forms to mutate. If we go back several hundred million years that gives life forms the ability to evolve, mutate, adapt and also go extinct.

Bryce

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8415294
06/06/25 02:17 AM
06/06/25 02:17 AM
Joined: Nov 2018
Mo
T
Trapper5123 Offline
trapper
Trapper5123  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Nov 2018
Mo
Who cares about any of this. You either believe or don't. I believe in a mud creek bank a cold beer and a pretty young woman that hasn't figured out I wear a touppee

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Giant Sage] #8415906
06/07/25 12:29 PM
06/07/25 12:29 PM
Joined: Dec 2024
North Pole, Alaska
Husky Offline OP
trapper
Husky  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Dec 2024
North Pole, Alaska
Originally Posted by Giant Sage
Husky
What future prophesy or prophecies do you believe have yet to be fulfilled?


Things such as the coming of the Anti-Christ, the Second Coming of Christ, and the eventual destruction of the earth.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Trapper5123] #8415919
06/07/25 01:07 PM
06/07/25 01:07 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
Originally Posted by Trapper5123
Who cares about any of this. You either believe or don't. I believe in a mud creek bank a cold beer and a pretty young woman that hasn't figured out I wear a touppee

Some of us have inquiring minds that rarely quit asking questions...I can never decide if it's a good thing or not.


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8415922
06/07/25 01:17 PM
06/07/25 01:17 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
Originally Posted by Husky
Originally Posted by Giant Sage
Husky
What future prophesy or prophecies do you believe have yet to be fulfilled?


Things such as the coming of the Anti-Christ, the Second Coming of Christ, and the eventual destruction of the earth.

I've wondered if the anti christ is just one person or a personification symbolic of the anti christ presence that is always present in the world. I think Nero was one of the first anti Christ's.


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8415924
06/07/25 01:23 PM
06/07/25 01:23 PM
Joined: Dec 2024
North Pole, Alaska
Husky Offline OP
trapper
Husky  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Dec 2024
North Pole, Alaska
Nero was anti Christ, but he was not THE Anti-Christ. The Bible says that when he is revealed the whole world will know.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8415946
06/07/25 01:53 PM
06/07/25 01:53 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
D
danny clifton Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
danny clifton  Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
D

Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
Im confused. Ecclesiastes 1:4 says the earth will be here forever.


Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: danny clifton] #8415947
06/07/25 01:55 PM
06/07/25 01:55 PM
Joined: Dec 2024
North Pole, Alaska
Husky Offline OP
trapper
Husky  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Dec 2024
North Pole, Alaska
Originally Posted by danny clifton
Im confused. Ecclesiastes 1:4 says the earth will be here forever.


Could you quote that verse here please?

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8415948
06/07/25 01:58 PM
06/07/25 01:58 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
D
danny clifton Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
danny clifton  Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
D

Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
Quote
One generation passeth away, and another generation cometh: but the earth abideth for ever.


Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: danny clifton] #8415959
06/07/25 02:35 PM
06/07/25 02:35 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Georgia
warrior Offline
trapper
warrior  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2007
Georgia
Originally Posted by danny clifton
Quote
One generation passeth away, and another generation cometh: but the earth abideth for ever.


Context, Ecclesiastes is not a book of prophecy, it is a book of wisdom. As such it is not laying out a theological or eschatological framework instead it is describing the learned wisdom of the "preacher in Jerusalem", aka Solomon. In this context Solomon is an old man approaching his own mortal end of life reflecting upon his own life of the pursuit of wisdom and he concludes thusly; vanities of vanities there is nothing new under the sun and the sum of all wisdom is the fear of God.

In the case of the earth in this passage and the troubles of our time on earth, the earth was here long before and will be here long after we are but a footnote in history.

BTW, Ecclesiastes is my favorite book of the Bible.


[Linked Image]
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8416053
06/07/25 06:38 PM
06/07/25 06:38 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
Originally Posted by Husky
Nero was anti Christ, but he was not THE Anti-Christ. The Bible says that when he is revealed the whole world will know.

Chapter and verse? Everyone in the known world at the time was subject to Romes power weren't they?


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8416180
06/08/25 12:42 AM
06/08/25 12:42 AM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
Originally Posted by Husky
Originally Posted by Giant Sage
Husky
What future prophesy or prophecies do you believe have yet to be fulfilled?


Things such as the coming of the Anti-Christ, the Second Coming of Christ, and the eventual destruction of the earth.

Sorry for the slow response Husky,
I also believe the second coming of Christ is a future fulfillment. Along with the earth as we know it ending.
My understanding of Antichrist is not of any one person. But as spoken of in John's epistles, denying the sovereignty of Christ with the Father. Any one who denies Jesus is the Christ is antichrist.
Wich includes Islam, and Jews along with the Gentile world that deny the resurrection.
I also believe in a future spiritual Jerusalem, in conjunction with the final throne judgment.
This heavenly Jerusalem with 12 foundations and 12 gates representing the fullness of the Gentiles.
Wich have been grafted in. The fulness of God's work.


Christ is King
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8416270
06/08/25 09:34 AM
06/08/25 09:34 AM
Joined: Feb 2020
Indiana
P
Providence Farm Offline
trapper
Providence Farm  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Feb 2020
Indiana

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Providence Farm] #8416404
06/08/25 03:12 PM
06/08/25 03:12 PM
Joined: Dec 2024
North Pole, Alaska
Husky Offline OP
trapper
Husky  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Dec 2024
North Pole, Alaska
Originally Posted by Providence Farm


Great read! Thanks for sharing!

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: PAskinner] #8416405
06/08/25 03:13 PM
06/08/25 03:13 PM
Joined: Dec 2024
North Pole, Alaska
Husky Offline OP
trapper
Husky  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Dec 2024
North Pole, Alaska
Originally Posted by PAskinner
Originally Posted by Husky
Nero was anti Christ, but he was not THE Anti-Christ. The Bible says that when he is revealed the whole world will know.

Chapter and verse? Everyone in the known world at the time was subject to Romes power weren't they?


I haven’t forgotten you, I still trying to piece together a good response.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8416618
06/08/25 11:56 PM
06/08/25 11:56 PM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
Originally Posted by Husky
Nero was anti Christ, but he was not THE Anti-Christ. The Bible says that when he is revealed the whole world will know.

Let me help you on chapter and verse.
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
2 Thessalonians 2:3-7
Speaking of the son of perdition.
Many of the church fathers believe this was the papacy. As did the reformers.
It wasn't until the 16th century that idea of this being a singular person came about.
A Jesuit named Francisco Riveara or somthing like that came up with the idea af a singular Anti-Christ.
Anti-Christ in the bible only appears in the 1sr and 2nd epistles of John. Not in prophetic books.
It's a generic term for non believers.


Christ is King
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8416619
06/09/25 12:06 AM
06/09/25 12:06 AM
Joined: Mar 2014
Central Texas
C
Chancey Offline
trapper
Chancey  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Mar 2014
Central Texas
I think Nimrod is most certainly the first representation of the antichrist.

Jesus tells us very plainly in nearly all the Gospels about what to expect. Especially in Matthew 24:37-39. Follow that rabbit hole Husky and see what was going on in the days of Noah.

Problem is, folks do more attending church than reading and understanding their very own Bibles IMO.

It's blasphemy to say that the Church has been compromised, but it has. Very few preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ anymore and what true salvation and redemption are. Many are "feel good" churches.
It is why membership in churches in the US is falling drastically.


Resident Conspiracy Theorist
Accused Moron, Nazi, Low IQ, Putin Fan Boy, and Obama Clone
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8416621
06/09/25 12:18 AM
06/09/25 12:18 AM
Joined: Jan 2008
Alaska and Washington State
W
waggler Online content
trapper
waggler  Online Content
trapper
W

Joined: Jan 2008
Alaska and Washington State
The Bible is reliable.
However , there are folks who try to twist it to confirm a bias.
Science is also reliable when not twisted to confirm a bias.
https://ncse.ngo/radiometric-dating-does-work


"My life is better than your vacation"
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Chancey] #8416622
06/09/25 12:24 AM
06/09/25 12:24 AM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
Originally Posted by Chancey
I think Nimrod is most certainly the first representation of the antichrist.

Jesus tells us very plainly in nearly all the Gospels about what to expect. Especially in Matthew 24:37-39. Follow that rabbit hole Husky and see what was going on in the days of Noah.

Problem is, folks do more attending church than reading and understanding their very own Bibles IMO.

It's blasphemy to say that the Church has been compromised, but it has. Very few preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ anymore and what true salvation and redemption are. Many are "feel good" churches.
It is why membership in churches in the US is falling drastically.

Hey Chancey, have you noticed when Jesus explains, as in the days of Noah. He does not mention the evilness of man's heart or the Giants. He speaks of the normalcy of the fact. Eating and drinking and marriage.
He also say no one will no but the father. So his description is not one of great tribulations or even some sign or signs to look for.
He also says one will be taken and one will be left.
Peaple that say the taken are the Rapture.
But in the day of Noah . Who did the flood take away?


Christ is King
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8416627
06/09/25 12:43 AM
06/09/25 12:43 AM
Joined: Mar 2014
Central Texas
C
Chancey Offline
trapper
Chancey  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Mar 2014
Central Texas
Giant Sage, I just see it as Jesus setting the context on what to expect; nothing more. Letting us know what the world will likely be like upon His return.
How do you take verse 15 of the same chapter?

The world was certainly different after the flood; but Jesus specifically mentions that time period. If I take it in that context, then the Bible makes sense to me.

I no longer believe in the rapture although taught it my entire life; but I am a growing Christian and don't know much. I just read and study my Bible.


Resident Conspiracy Theorist
Accused Moron, Nazi, Low IQ, Putin Fan Boy, and Obama Clone
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8416630
06/09/25 12:58 AM
06/09/25 12:58 AM
Joined: Mar 2014
Central Texas
C
Chancey Offline
trapper
Chancey  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Mar 2014
Central Texas
Verses 37-39 or a pretext to verses 15-31. IMO.


Resident Conspiracy Theorist
Accused Moron, Nazi, Low IQ, Putin Fan Boy, and Obama Clone
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8416632
06/09/25 01:06 AM
06/09/25 01:06 AM
Joined: Mar 2014
Central Texas
C
Chancey Offline
trapper
Chancey  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Mar 2014
Central Texas
Husky,

As far as the reliability of the Bible, Read and take to heart Psalm 22. It pretty much describes our Lord's sacrifice hundreds of years before it happened. The first verse is even the same as what Jesus cried out on the cross. Isaiah is good too. One either believes it or they don't. Not our job to prove them wrong; just live by Christ.


Resident Conspiracy Theorist
Accused Moron, Nazi, Low IQ, Putin Fan Boy, and Obama Clone
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Chancey] #8416635
06/09/25 01:20 AM
06/09/25 01:20 AM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
Chancey I believe Matthew 24 is speaking of the distruction of the temple up to vs 33. then Jesus is speaking of his second coming . This I believe is simultaneous with the final throne judgment and the catching up of the saints.
Vs 15 is cross referenced with Luke 21:20 wich I beleave is the judgment Jesus spoke of in Matthew 23. The army's of Rome taking the Temple.
Luke 21:20 when you shall see Jerusalem compassed with army's, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh.


Christ is King
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Chancey] #8416636
06/09/25 01:25 AM
06/09/25 01:25 AM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
Originally Posted by Chancey
Husky,

As far as the reliability of the Bible, Read and take to heart Psalm 22. It pretty much describes our Lord's sacrifice hundreds of years before it happened. The first verse is even the same as what Jesus cried out on the cross. Isaiah is good too. One either believes it or they don't. Not our job to prove them wrong; just live by Christ.

Psalm 22, I was racking my brain trying to remember that passage.
Thanks Chance.


Christ is King
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8416671
06/09/25 05:55 AM
06/09/25 05:55 AM
Joined: Dec 2024
AR
J
J Staton Offline
trapper
J Staton  Offline
trapper
J

Joined: Dec 2024
AR
I think Constantine was another example of anti Christ. By forcing the mass conversion of the Roman empire into Christendom, it introduced paganist practices into the church.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8416677
06/09/25 06:06 AM
06/09/25 06:06 AM
Joined: Mar 2018
NC
T
Tailhunter Offline
trapper
Tailhunter  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Mar 2018
NC
Cool thing about the bible and God and Jesus, you have a free will to believe in it or not.
No matter of argument or evidence will convince some that it is true.

And others believe at first introduction.

Make your choice and live your life accordingly.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8416684
06/09/25 06:24 AM
06/09/25 06:24 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
D
danny clifton Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
danny clifton  Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
D

Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
Quote
Chancey

It is why membership in churches in the US is falling drastically


I think it is because of all those stories like people surviving being tossed into a furnace, a talking snake, manna from heaven, surviving being eaten by a great fish, on and on.


Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: danny clifton] #8416707
06/09/25 07:52 AM
06/09/25 07:52 AM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
Originally Posted by danny clifton
Quote
Chancey

It is why membership in churches in the US is falling drastically


I think it is because of all those stories like people surviving being tossed into a furnace, a talking snake, manna from heaven, surviving being eaten by a great fish, on and on.

[Linked Image]
Husky, you wanted reliability.


Christ is King
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8416727
06/09/25 08:29 AM
06/09/25 08:29 AM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
Once you understand that Jesus is talking about the roman destruction of Jerusalem in Matthew 24, you can't unsee it. The verse that absolutely confirms it for me is when he talks about the vultures or eagles gathering around the carcasses. The Roman armies had eagles on thier shields. Plus Jesus plainly says it was to happen in that generation. You might be wondering about stars falling etc, but that is common hyperbolic language used in OT prophecy.


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: PAskinner] #8416736
06/09/25 08:45 AM
06/09/25 08:45 AM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
Originally Posted by PAskinner
Once you understand that Jesus is talking about the roman destruction of Jerusalem in Matthew 24, you can't unsee it. The verse that absolutely confirms it for me is when he talks about the vultures or eagles gathering around the carcasses. The Roman armies had eagles on thier shields. Plus Jesus plainly says it was to happen in that generation. You might be wondering about stars falling etc, but that is common hyperbolic language used in OT prophecy.

Just reading the previous chapter. Chapter 23 especially verses 29-39. Jesus is obviously speaking of judgment
In the generation that they are living in.
The distruction of Jerusalem in 70AD is one of the great proofs of the reliability of bible prophecy.


Christ is King
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: PAskinner] #8416737
06/09/25 08:45 AM
06/09/25 08:45 AM
Joined: Jul 2022
Va
S
Spike369 Offline
trapper
Spike369  Offline
trapper
S

Joined: Jul 2022
Va
Maybe when Jesus talks of the end times he talking about the end of a country, era or your own life. We'll all find out at our end of time.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Spike369] #8416770
06/09/25 10:13 AM
06/09/25 10:13 AM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
Originally Posted by Spike369
Maybe when Jesus talks of the end times he talking about the end of a country, era or your own life. We'll all find out at our end of time.

I believe he speaks of all three scenarios. Depending on the context of the passage.
(As far as the reliability of the Bible goes.) Many of these prophecies have been fulfilled.
Obviously the end of life will answer Questions If there is life after death,
If not then it's just back to the dirt I suppose. Fulfilled prophecy is confirmation of course.
But my faith is because of the changes in my life. The Holy spirit moving and teaching me, and confirming in my heart God's existence. Anyone who has become born again and has the spirit guiding them would understand what I'm speaking of. Was blind but now I see. Just like Saul's conversation.
He went from being antichrist, persecuting Christ to being a warrior for Christ.
All by Revelation. He was blind till his eyes were open to truth.


Christ is King
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8416798
06/09/25 11:27 AM
06/09/25 11:27 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
T
Trapper7 Offline
trapper
Trapper7  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
Originally Posted by Husky
Originally Posted by Giant Sage
Husky
What future prophesy or prophecies do you believe have yet to be fulfilled?


Things such as the coming of the Anti-Christ, the Second Coming of Christ, and the eventual destruction of the earth.

Some people thought Hitler was the anti-Christ at that time. However, he didn't fit the prophesy. The anti-Christ is yet to come. Jesus will return after that happens.


The first bottles of Coca Cola contained 3.5 grams of cocaine. That's how our grandparents were able to walk to school uphill both ways in the snow.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Trapper7] #8416826
06/09/25 12:07 PM
06/09/25 12:07 PM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
(The antichrist will comes, Jesus will return after that happens. )

Trapper 7, if you could give verses or passages that comfirm the antichrist is coming.
And Jesus will return after that happens.
This would be helpful. Thank you.


Christ is King
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8416854
06/09/25 01:46 PM
06/09/25 01:46 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
T
TreedaBlackdog Offline
trapper
TreedaBlackdog  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
I don't think most folks are quite prepared for the bloodshed when Jesus comes again on Earth....Rev 14:20

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: TreedaBlackdog] #8416883
06/09/25 03:31 PM
06/09/25 03:31 PM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
Originally Posted by TreedaBlackdog
I don't think most folks are quite prepared for the bloodshed when Jesus comes again on Earth....Rev 14:20

Isn't Revelation ch 14 about the distruction of Jerusalem?


Christ is King
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8416958
06/09/25 06:20 PM
06/09/25 06:20 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
This imagery with the destruction of Jerusalem can hardly be missed since similar language is used concerning the fall of the same city to the Babylonians in 586 B.C.: “The Lord has trampled Virgin Daughter Judah like grapes in a winepress” (Lam. 1:15).


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8416972
06/09/25 06:45 PM
06/09/25 06:45 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
East-Central Wisconsin
B
bblwi Offline
trapper
bblwi  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Dec 2006
East-Central Wisconsin
Isn't Revelation ch 14 about the distruction of Jerusalem?

Yes it could be but it the book of Revelations was written in 96 AD by John, As stated above the 1st temple was destroyed in 586 BC and the Romans destroyed the 2nd temple in AD 70 during the Roman Jewish war that was from 66AD to 73 AD. The Babylonians were a major enemy of the Jews. The Romans were major enemies of the early Christians and Thus John even in isolation on Patmos was not inclined to dis the Romans.


Bryce

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8416985
06/09/25 07:09 PM
06/09/25 07:09 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
D
danny clifton Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
danny clifton  Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
D

Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
How come there is so much contention on what it says?


Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8417006
06/09/25 07:51 PM
06/09/25 07:51 PM
Joined: Mar 2014
Central Texas
C
Chancey Offline
trapper
Chancey  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Mar 2014
Central Texas
Because most Christians fall into one of two categories Danny.

Premillennialism or Amillennialism. These are two distinct eschatological views that differ in their understanding of the millennium and Christ's return. I think Zionism also plays a large role in which side of the divide one falls on.


Resident Conspiracy Theorist
Accused Moron, Nazi, Low IQ, Putin Fan Boy, and Obama Clone
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: bblwi] #8417007
06/09/25 07:51 PM
06/09/25 07:51 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
Originally Posted by bblwi
Isn't Revelation ch 14 about the distruction of Jerusalem?

Yes it could be but it the book of Revelations was written in 96 AD by John, As stated above the 1st temple was destroyed in 586 BC and the Romans destroyed the 2nd temple in AD 70 during the Roman Jewish war that was from 66AD to 73 AD. The Babylonians were a major enemy of the Jews. The Romans were major enemies of the early Christians and Thus John even in isolation on Patmos was not inclined to dis the Romans.


Bryce

I don't think John was worried about dissing the Roman's.
Also haven't seen any proof that revelations was written that late.


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: danny clifton] #8417008
06/09/25 07:54 PM
06/09/25 07:54 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
Originally Posted by danny clifton
How come there is so much contention on what it says?

Because revelations is a highly symbolic book, and open to interpretation.


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: PAskinner] #8417026
06/09/25 08:56 PM
06/09/25 08:56 PM
Joined: Dec 2024
AR
J
J Staton Offline
trapper
J Staton  Offline
trapper
J

Joined: Dec 2024
AR
Originally Posted by PAskinner
Originally Posted by danny clifton
How come there is so much contention on what it says?

Because revelations is a highly symbolic book, and open to interpretation.

Or revelations is literal and folks think it is symbolic. smile

Last edited by J Staton; 06/09/25 08:57 PM.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: danny clifton] #8417079
06/09/25 10:09 PM
06/09/25 10:09 PM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
Originally Posted by danny clifton
How come there is so much contention on what it says?

I didn't realize there was contention in this conversation.
No more than if we were talking about the best trap for Coyotes or how many drops of coyote urine is to much.
The thread is about the reliability of the Bible. Seeking reliability is Seeking truth. This conversation is amongst believers of different understanding and some who have doubts or maybe don't believe.
I ask questions for two reasons. One is because it's edifying and helps me understand other believers views.
The other is to share scripture. Chapters, verses, and passages in the way that I understand them.
And I voice my beliefs as a hope others will as well. And I'll answer questions as I would hope others would.
Is I'm responding to your question.


Christ is King
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8417119
06/09/25 10:50 PM
06/09/25 10:50 PM
Joined: Mar 2014
Central Texas
C
Chancey Offline
trapper
Chancey  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Mar 2014
Central Texas
^^^Excellent post Giant Sage.


Resident Conspiracy Theorist
Accused Moron, Nazi, Low IQ, Putin Fan Boy, and Obama Clone
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Chancey] #8417140
06/09/25 11:14 PM
06/09/25 11:14 PM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
Chancey,
I know your a truth seeker.
My hope is that Husky will read all the responses and learn from the different views.
Ask questions and think outside the box = let scripture speak to him with an open mind.
I'm glad you are standing for your beliefs Husky. Keep reading and pray for truth and discernment.
When I was a babe in the faith I was gung-ho to preach the Gospel to all the would.
I had a young pastor tell me to keep reading. I cant tell you how many times his advice has popped back into my head. One of the armors of God is to have your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel.
This is most important to evangelize.


Christ is King
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8417156
06/09/25 11:44 PM
06/09/25 11:44 PM
Joined: Mar 2014
Central Texas
C
Chancey Offline
trapper
Chancey  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Mar 2014
Central Texas
Yep!



Resident Conspiracy Theorist
Accused Moron, Nazi, Low IQ, Putin Fan Boy, and Obama Clone
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Chancey] #8417158
06/09/25 11:57 PM
06/09/25 11:57 PM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
Thanks for that Chancey.


Christ is King
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Giant Sage] #8417341
06/10/25 10:52 AM
06/10/25 10:52 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
T
Trapper7 Offline
trapper
Trapper7  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
Originally Posted by Giant Sage
(The antichrist will comes, Jesus will return after that happens. )

Trapper 7, if you could give verses or passages that comfirm the antichrist is coming.
And Jesus will return after that happens.
This would be helpful. Thank you.

I think the Olivet Discourse is a clue Jesus gives. He says, it will take place during the generation living at that time. The apostles are asking him, Matt 24:3, "Tell us, when will theses thing be and what will be the sign of your coming and the end of the age?" Then in verse 15: "Therefore when you see the abomination of desolation which was spoken of through Daniel the prophet, standing in the hold place." This is the antichrist. Prior to this are the clues he gives.

I feel the end of the age is we are currently living in the church age. It started with the apostles, Paul, and others as they were building the church. The church age will come to an end. We are seeing much of what Jesus said will come to be in this present time. After all this takes place Verse 30 says, "And then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in the sky, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of the sky with power and glory." John makes reference to this in Rev. 1:7 as well.


The first bottles of Coca Cola contained 3.5 grams of cocaine. That's how our grandparents were able to walk to school uphill both ways in the snow.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: TreedaBlackdog] #8417342
06/10/25 10:53 AM
06/10/25 10:53 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
T
Trapper7 Offline
trapper
Trapper7  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
Originally Posted by TreedaBlackdog
I don't think most folks are quite prepared for the bloodshed when Jesus comes again on Earth....Rev 14:20

It's happening now and this is only the beginning.


The first bottles of Coca Cola contained 3.5 grams of cocaine. That's how our grandparents were able to walk to school uphill both ways in the snow.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: lumberjack391] #8417350
06/10/25 11:33 AM
06/10/25 11:33 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
T
Trapper7 Offline
trapper
Trapper7  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
Originally Posted by lumberjack391
Trapper7-Tectonics pushed the sea life up to the top. Scientists believe a huge meteor impact caused the demise of most prehistoric life. You must have mis-read me, I am looking for the link you had of fake fossils dating millions of years old.

Tectonics probably did push the sea life to the top which could be proof that the world was once water covered. I think it's possible those could have been a result of the flood of Noah.

When it comes to the millions of years old the earth is I'm only repeating what scientists say. I have no idea on the exact age of the earth, but as mankind was put on it isn't millions of years old. There were no dinosaurs during the time of Abraham. There was no mention of them during that time.


The first bottles of Coca Cola contained 3.5 grams of cocaine. That's how our grandparents were able to walk to school uphill both ways in the snow.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: J Staton] #8417445
06/10/25 02:38 PM
06/10/25 02:38 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
Originally Posted by J Staton
[quote=PAskinner][quote=danny clifton]How come there is so much contention on what it says?
Because revelations is a highly symbolic book, and open to interpretation.
Or revelations is literal and folks think it is symbolic. smile

Even the literalist takes a lot of it as symbolic. Does anyone actually think Jesus has a sword coming out of his mouth? And I bet if you go back and read the really early church they believe the Romans were anti Christ. I'm ok with being wrong, lol, there's over 100 views of end times and most are highly speculative. I don't believe in a secret rapture anymore, for example, because it's based on one misinterpreted verse. Jesus is coming back to judge the world, but it's all one event. Anyways I don't think he's gonna care if we misunderstood prophecy as long as we are under the blood.


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8417449
06/10/25 02:50 PM
06/10/25 02:50 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
T
TreedaBlackdog Offline
trapper
TreedaBlackdog  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
2 judgements - get into your Bible PAskinner

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8417451
06/10/25 02:51 PM
06/10/25 02:51 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
T
TreedaBlackdog Offline
trapper
TreedaBlackdog  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
The Bible describes two major judgments: the Great White Throne Judgment for unbelievers (Revelation 20:11-15) and the Judgment Seat of Christ for believers (2 Corinthians 5:10; Romans 14:10). The Great White Throne Judgment will assess the deeds of those who do not believe in Christ, while the Judgment Seat of Christ will evaluate the works and faithfulness of believers for the purpose of rewards.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: PAskinner] #8417454
06/10/25 02:57 PM
06/10/25 02:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
T
TreedaBlackdog Offline
trapper
TreedaBlackdog  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
I don't believe in a secret rapture anymore, for example, because it's based on one misinterpreted verse. [/quote]


What scripture and what is the correct meaning then? Not too secret is it if you know it could be coming?

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8417457
06/10/25 03:05 PM
06/10/25 03:05 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
T
TreedaBlackdog Offline
trapper
TreedaBlackdog  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
and for some of you including Savell who may not understand why Jesus only healed certain individuals at times He tells us - in Matthew 13:58 And he did not do many miracles there because of their lack of faith.

We may not understand everything Jesus did and why He always did what He did - but the more we read and get to know His Word - we will learn.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8417459
06/10/25 03:08 PM
06/10/25 03:08 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
T
TreedaBlackdog Offline
trapper
TreedaBlackdog  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
and for good measure some Matthew 12:

9 Whoever has ears, let them hear.”

10 The disciples came to him and asked, “Why do you speak to the people in parables?”

11 He replied, “Because the knowledge of the secrets of the kingdom of heaven has been given to you, but not to them. 12 Whoever has will be given more, and they will have an abundance. Whoever does not have, even what they have will be taken from them. 13 This is why I speak to them in parables:

“Though seeing, they do not see;
though hearing, they do not hear or understand.

14 In them is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah:

“‘You will be ever hearing but never understanding;
you will be ever seeing but never perceiving.
15 For this people’s heart has become calloused;
they hardly hear with their ears,
and they have closed their eyes.
Otherwise they might see with their eyes,
hear with their ears,
understand with their hearts
and turn, and I would heal them.’[a]

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: TreedaBlackdog] #8417485
06/10/25 04:18 PM
06/10/25 04:18 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
Originally Posted by TreedaBlackdog
2 judgements - get into your Bible PAskinner

Yes, one when we die and one final judgment. Still only one second coming.


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: TreedaBlackdog] #8417489
06/10/25 04:27 PM
06/10/25 04:27 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
Originally Posted by TreedaBlackdog
I don't believe in a secret rapture anymore, for example, because it's based on one misinterpreted verse.



What scripture and what is the correct meaning then? Not too secret is it if you know it could be coming?
[/quote]
Secret meaning a "Left behind" series scenario, where believers go " poof" and dissappear. Most people get the rapture from Thessalonians 4, but it's actually about the final judgment.

1 Thessalonians 4:16, "For the Lord himself, with a cry of command, with the archangel’s call and with the sound of God’s trumpet, will descend from heaven, and the dead in Christ will rise first."

Ok, now the supposed rapture verse:
1 Thessalonians 4:17, "Then we who are alive, who are left, will be caught up in the clouds together with them to meet the Lord in the air; and so we will be with the Lord forever."

Pretty obvious this is all one event, happening at his return.


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8417726
06/10/25 09:53 PM
06/10/25 09:53 PM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
Trapper7,
You mentioned the abomination of desolation being the antichrist.
In Luke's parallel verses, Luke 21:20 it appears that when jerusalem is compassed with armies was his description
Of the abomination of desolation. Jesus did say to the Apostles that Not one stone of the temple will not be left standing. He also said in verse 34 that this generation shall not pass, till all there things be fulfilled.


Christ is King
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8417769
06/10/25 10:42 PM
06/10/25 10:42 PM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
Also after the desolation verse in Luke 21:20
Vs 22 he mentions judgment =vengeance. [Linked Image]
The generation he is speaking to is surly the same generation he is warning of coming judgment in Matthew 23:33-36
[Linked Image]
Does this really seem like Jesus is speaking of anything other that the 70 ad distruction of Jerusalem and the temple.


Christ is King
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8417779
06/10/25 10:48 PM
06/10/25 10:48 PM
Joined: Jun 2007
Illinois
foxkidd44 Offline
trapper
foxkidd44  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jun 2007
Illinois
I’m not sure where I read it, but it was about the prophecies in the Old Testament that were fulfilled by JESUS.
There are over 300 known prophecies( probably more yet to be discovered)that were fulfilled .
The institute of science and mathematics ( yes it is a real place) decided to tackle this.
The odds of 1 man fulfilling just 8 of them were 1 in a quintillion.
To help understand these odds.. take a stack of quarters about 18 inches tall.. and place a stack in every 2 inches in Texas… now, pull one quarter out of all those stacks.
JESUS fulfilled over 300.
Here’s another thought…JESUS appeared to over 500 eye witness after his resurrection, yet, it’s dismissed.
But ceasr was stabbed in the back supposedly by Brutus and is considered as a fact, yet, there were no witnesses.


Stand by your principles, Stand by your guns, and victory complete and permanent is sure at last.
Abraham Lincoln
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: foxkidd44] #8417784
06/10/25 10:53 PM
06/10/25 10:53 PM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
Good evidence for the reliability of the Bible right there foxkidd44.


Christ is King
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8417804
06/10/25 11:28 PM
06/10/25 11:28 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
michigan, usa
W
wildlifeartist1 Offline
trapper
wildlifeartist1  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Mar 2007
michigan, usa
Wow how misinformed
check the facts the real truth not what some preacher said
we didn't even have what we call the bible till the 4th century
what did the world do before that
if one part is made up why can't it all be.
judges 15
samson went out and caught (three hundred fox), tied their tails
together in pairs and lashed a torch between each pair of tails
to spread fire in the philistine's crops
yeah, sure he did.
how long would it take to catch 300 fox
probably have to have pens to put them in and feed and water too.
is this a true story

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8417807
06/10/25 11:36 PM
06/10/25 11:36 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Oregon
beaverpeeler Offline
trapper
beaverpeeler  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Oregon
I'm right about where Wildlifeartist is on all of the bible stuff. I'm a pretty decent BS'er but those boys had me beat hands down.

Last edited by beaverpeeler; 06/10/25 11:36 PM.

My fear of moving stairs is escalating!
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: beaverpeeler] #8417821
06/11/25 12:28 AM
06/11/25 12:28 AM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
Originally Posted by beaverpeeler
I'm right about where Wildlifeartist is on all of the bible stuff. I'm a pretty decent BS'er but those boys had me beat hands down.

BP, I'm confident that if you had 2000 years you could come up with some whoppers lol.
Just funin.

In all seriousness, the story of Samson and the foxes seems more like folklore.
We realy don't know if Samson had super powers and I'm not sure if the story of Samson is a prophetic story.
I believe Samson was a Nazarite which I believe that they were not allowed to cut there hair.
Maybe this was a precursor of Jesus the Nazarite who had super natural power.
I do know of one trapper who cought 400 fox in 20 days and 500 in 30.
Maybe some of you have heard of him. His name is Ogorman.
When i see the pyramids I have a hard time believing that they could have been built without some sort of super natural power, but they exist. Over 5000 pieces of evidence that are over 90 % in agreement is pretty compelling evidence of the accuracy of scripture. Try and make that happen through the grapevine. and see what the accuracy is.
Take it as you will. I'm glad we have free will and are not forced what to believe or think.

Last edited by Giant Sage; 06/11/25 12:29 AM. Reason: Spelling

Christ is King
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Trapper7] #8417846
06/11/25 02:55 AM
06/11/25 02:55 AM
Joined: Apr 2017
PA
L
lumberjack391 Offline
trapper
lumberjack391  Offline
trapper
L

Joined: Apr 2017
PA
Originally Posted by Trapper7
Originally Posted by lumberjack391
Trapper7-Tectonics pushed the sea life up to the top. Scientists believe a huge meteor impact caused the demise of most prehistoric life. You must have mis-read me, I am looking for the link you had of fake fossils dating millions of years old.

Tectonics probably did push the sea life to the top which could be proof that the world was once water covered. I think it's possible those could have been a result of the flood of Noah.

When it comes to the millions of years old the earth is I'm only repeating what scientists say. I have no idea on the exact age of the earth, but as mankind was put on it isn't millions of years old. There were no dinosaurs during the time of Abraham. There was no mention of them during that time.

Trapper7.......once again....you stated someone was recently making fake fossils and having them dated millions of years old. I cant find that post now but I am interested in reading about it. can you direct me to that source? And how can a flood kill sea dwelling animals? I believe the opposite to be true, drought would almost have to happen for them to die and be fossilized. And why does it have to always be Noahs flood, Im sure there were many back then and earlier just as is happening now? If the earth was once water covered, how could it flood?

Last edited by lumberjack391; 06/11/25 03:04 AM.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: lumberjack391] #8417910
06/11/25 08:55 AM
06/11/25 08:55 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
T
TreedaBlackdog Offline
trapper
TreedaBlackdog  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO

Trapper7.......once again....you stated someone was recently making fake fossils and having them dated millions of years old. I cant find that post now but I am interested in reading about it. can you direct me to that source? And how can a flood kill sea dwelling animals? I believe the opposite to be true, drought would almost have to happen for them to die and be fossilized. And why does it have to always be Noahs flood, Im sure there were many back then and earlier just as is happening now? If the earth was once water covered, how could it flood?[/quote]

I will tackle some of this. I too have read and watched as carbon dating of new materials comes back millions of years old. With heat and pressure and flooding - materials can be changed and scientific samples taken and examined and random dates assigned according to interpretation. Flood could easily kill sea animals by dilution of needed materials in the sea. Don't believe me - get a salt water aquarium, buy a bunch of expensive salt water fish and fill it with fresh water.
Show me one example of a flood before Noah or I will simplify it for you - show me one example of a rain before then. And again - show me where the Earth was ever covered by water before the flood.

Again, many people simply can't believe what the Bible says and don't even truly know it enough to know what it says. Quit assuming things and research them. It is ok to question things but we should all try to use critical thinking skills and learn. My faith has led me to many, many questions I have researched and experienced for myself. I have learned to believe and trust in Jesus and the Word.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8417917
06/11/25 09:09 AM
06/11/25 09:09 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
T
TreedaBlackdog Offline
trapper
TreedaBlackdog  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
Brandon Lake has a song out called - Too Good to Not believe. I agree with him. When you begin to seek God and desire to know Him you will learn more and more. If you continue to doubt and not believe and try to use our limited minds you can stay stuck in unbelief. That is the wonderful thing about salvation being a gift and something WE can not do for ourselves. There is only one requirement to be saved by grace - to be a sinner. We all qualify. We all deserve death as there is not a single one of us without sin - we all know we have done wrong. But we have hope. His name is Jesus. He paid the price for our sins so that we can choose life eternal with Him or eternal damnation by continuing on in our unbelief. When we begin to understand, we won't ever be able to fully understand, then we have faith. When our faith is in the redemptive work of Jesus Christ and we begin to realize what He did and what authors and witnesses testified about His life and hundreds of years before His birth - we begin to understand the reliability of the Bible. I believe in the reliability of the Bible because I believe in Jesus Christ as my Lord and Saviour. I know who I am in Christ. I know I was dead and now I am alive.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: wildlifeartist1] #8417933
06/11/25 09:46 AM
06/11/25 09:46 AM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
Originally Posted by wildlifeartist1
Wow how misinformed
check the facts the real truth not what some preacher said
we didn't even have what we call the bible till the 4th century
what did the world do before that
if one part is made up why can't it all be.
judges 15
samson went out and caught (three hundred fox), tied their tails
together in pairs and lashed a torch between each pair of tails
to spread fire in the philistine's crops
yeah, sure he did.
how long would it take to catch 300 fox
probably have to have pens to put them in and feed and water too.
is this a true story


You asked what they used before the forth century...the writings of the apostles that became the Bible, along with the Torah. Isaiah alone is enough to convince me it's true. Dated long before Christ, it predicted his existence and death. Samson killed a lion with his hands too. He wasn't an ordinary man when God empowered him.


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8417950
06/11/25 10:20 AM
06/11/25 10:20 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
T
TreedaBlackdog Offline
trapper
TreedaBlackdog  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
We just spent a year and half on Isaiah and i agree with it alone and my life experiences it would be enough to convince me. Too many prophetic words fulfilled in it alone by Jesus.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: TreedaBlackdog] #8417951
06/11/25 10:20 AM
06/11/25 10:20 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
T
Trapper7 Offline
trapper
Trapper7  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
Originally Posted by TreedaBlackdog

Trapper7.......once again....you stated someone was recently making fake fossils and having them dated millions of years old. I cant find that post now but I am interested in reading about it. can you direct me to that source? And how can a flood kill sea dwelling animals? I believe the opposite to be true, drought would almost have to happen for them to die and be fossilized. And why does it have to always be Noahs flood, Im sure there were many back then and earlier just as is happening now? If the earth was once water covered, how could it flood?


I will tackle some of this. I too have read and watched as carbon dating of new materials comes back millions of years old. With heat and pressure and flooding - materials can be changed and scientific samples taken and examined and random dates assigned according to interpretation. Flood could easily kill sea animals by dilution of needed materials in the sea. Don't believe me - get a salt water aquarium, buy a bunch of expensive salt water fish and fill it with fresh water.
Show me one example of a flood before Noah or I will simplify it for you - show me one example of a rain before then. And again - show me where the Earth was ever covered by water before the flood.

Again, many people simply can't believe what the Bible says and don't even truly know it enough to know what it says. Quit assuming things and research them. It is ok to question things but we should all try to use critical thinking skills and learn. My faith has led me to many, many questions I have researched and experienced for myself. I have learned to believe and trust in Jesus and the Word.
[/quote]
First of all, I don't remember saying someone was making fake fossils and having them dated millions of years old. But, I can see where shysters might do something like that to make a buck. I made mention that we found sea shells on a mountain in CO while elk hunting there. If tectonic plates made the sea high and dry, sea dwelling animals would perish.

In Genesis chapter 1, it clearly says the earth was formless and void and God made the waters recede and the land became visible. This would have been before the flood of Noah. You don't have to research that, it's a fact. Some bible scholars say there could have been many floods prior to Genesis 1. I don't know if there was or not, but the earth was flooded prior to the flood of Noah. That's just common sense.


The first bottles of Coca Cola contained 3.5 grams of cocaine. That's how our grandparents were able to walk to school uphill both ways in the snow.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Giant Sage] #8417961
06/11/25 10:54 AM
06/11/25 10:54 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
T
Trapper7 Offline
trapper
Trapper7  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
Originally Posted by Giant Sage
Also after the desolation verse in Luke 21:20
Vs 22 he mentions judgment =vengeance. [Linked Image]
The generation he is speaking to is surly the same generation he is warning of coming judgment in Matthew 23:33-36
[Linked Image]
Does this really seem like Jesus is speaking of anything other that the 70 ad distruction of Jerusalem and the temple.

I think it does. It definitely predicts his return in both gospels. The generation he refers to is the generation at that future time, not the generation alive when he spoke these words.

2 Thessalonians 2, Paul is talking about the return of Jesus. He is referring to the anti-christ who is revealed as a man who exalts himself above God as he takes his seat in the temple displaying himself as being God.


The first bottles of Coca Cola contained 3.5 grams of cocaine. That's how our grandparents were able to walk to school uphill both ways in the snow.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8417981
06/11/25 11:33 AM
06/11/25 11:33 AM
Joined: Apr 2017
PA
L
lumberjack391 Offline
trapper
lumberjack391  Offline
trapper
L

Joined: Apr 2017
PA
I agree, a flood could possibly kill sea creatures, a drought would be more likely. I try to use critical thinking like science. Im pretty sure it was you that made that post but it doesnt matter now, it is gone- I cant find it. They were fossils already when the tektonic plates pushed them up to the top of the mountain. You say the earth was flooded prior to the flood of Noah, How is that common sense and where did the extra water come from?

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Trapper7] #8417987
06/11/25 12:11 PM
06/11/25 12:11 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
Originally Posted by Trapper7
Originally Posted by Giant Sage
Also after the desolation verse in Luke 21:20
Vs 22 he mentions judgment =vengeance. [Linked Image]
The generation he is speaking to is surly the same generation he is warning of coming judgment in Matthew 23:33-36
[Linked Image]
Does this really seem like Jesus is speaking of anything other that the 70 ad distruction of Jerusalem and the temple.

I think it does. It definitely predicts his return in both gospels. The generation he refers to is the generation at that future time, not the generation alive when he spoke these words.

2 Thessalonians 2, Paul is talking about the return of Jesus. He is referring to the anti-christ who is revealed as a man who exalts himself above God as he takes his seat in the temple displaying himself as being God.

He was talking to that generation. Otherwise what good is fleeing to the mountains? You can't escape from God's final judgment, but you might be able to hide from an army. Yes, the destruction of Jerusalem was God's judgment on the unbelieving Jews. It changed everything for them. No more sacrificial system (Christ was the last sacrifice.) The temple desecration and destruction. Even the part about scorging prophets in the synagogue. Sounds familiar because Paul and others were beaten and scouged by the Jews. All this happened in the first century.

"When you see Jerusalem being surrounded by armies, you will know that its desolation is near." I don't know how he could have made it any plainer, but for some reason people want to move all this into the future and applaud for Israel the nation instead of Jesus.


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8418010
06/11/25 01:20 PM
06/11/25 01:20 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
T
TreedaBlackdog Offline
trapper
TreedaBlackdog  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
In Genesis chapter 1, it clearly says the earth was formless and void and God made the waters recede and the land became visible. - quote from Trapper7

I agree with the earth as formless and void and waters being present as the Spirit of the Lord moved on them. I read again and see a firmament or vault then being created (heaven). Waters were then split above and below heaven (Day2) On day 3 waters below the firmament were gathered together and dry earth or land was formed. I disagree water receded and it became visible - it had not been formed or created. The earth was without form........it is difficult to comprehend but we all need to slow down and learn what the Bible says, not what we think we know. I myself just learned again on day 3 with the land formed, then plants and grass were created - a full day before the sun. Wonder how they functioned without photosynthesis...........I can't explain it but believe it.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8418440
06/12/25 11:18 AM
06/12/25 11:18 AM
Joined: Mar 2007
michigan, usa
W
wildlifeartist1 Offline
trapper
wildlifeartist1  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Mar 2007
michigan, usa
genesis says the word cattle what are cattle for if not to kill and eat?
so death was already on its why
and god made domesticated cows sheep goats dogs pig and many other nope man did we can trace it back 10,000 years or more
don't get me wrong i would like to believe again but once's you see the magic trick
you can't unsee it
and when it doesn't make sense anymore you can't make it

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8418459
06/12/25 11:34 AM
06/12/25 11:34 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Oregon
beaverpeeler Offline
trapper
beaverpeeler  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Oregon
The premise of carbon14 dating of fossils is already sketchy. We know that carbon14 cannot date anything older than about 60,000 years and is most reliable to about 20-25,000 years. Millions of years is not possible and nobody except people trying to disprove science would even go down that road.


My fear of moving stairs is escalating!
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8418466
06/12/25 11:38 AM
06/12/25 11:38 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
T
Trapper7 Offline
trapper
Trapper7  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
GS, Jesus and Paul are referring to his return in combination to the other things. If it was that present generation he was referring to, when did Jesus return? The only group I know of that say Jesus has already returned are the Jehovah Witnesses.


The first bottles of Coca Cola contained 3.5 grams of cocaine. That's how our grandparents were able to walk to school uphill both ways in the snow.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Trapper7] #8418582
06/12/25 04:22 PM
06/12/25 04:22 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
Originally Posted by Trapper7
GS, Jesus and Paul are referring to his return in combination to the other things. If it was that present generation he was referring to, when did Jesus return? The only group I know of that say Jesus has already returned are the Jehovah Witnesses.

Let me ask another question just to get you thinking: when was Jesus ' first coming? Because it is in the Bible and it wasn't as a baby.


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8418596
06/12/25 04:51 PM
06/12/25 04:51 PM
Joined: Dec 2024
AR
J
J Staton Offline
trapper
J Staton  Offline
trapper
J

Joined: Dec 2024
AR
The first coming would be mentioned in John1:1.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Trapper7] #8418637
06/12/25 06:32 PM
06/12/25 06:32 PM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
Originally Posted by Trapper7
GS, Jesus and Paul are referring to his return in combination to the other things. If it was that present generation he was referring to, when did Jesus return? The only group I know of that say Jesus has already returned are the Jehovah Witnesses.

T7
I believe Jesus speaking to an audience that understood old testament judgment language. .
Hears a few..
Lev 16:2 Ezekial 30:3 joel2:2 Zephiniah 1:15 (comes in clouds)
Isaiah 13:10. 34:4. Ez 32:7-8 Jer4:27-28 darkness, stars falling.
Apocalyptic type language.


Christ is King
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8418647
06/12/25 06:56 PM
06/12/25 06:56 PM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
T7
Hear is a good example of prophecy leading to Jesus regarding the stars falling.
If you read it in context . [Linked Image]
Obviously this is not actual Starz.
It's speaking of how the family of Jacob will bow to there brother Joseph.
Another interesting prophecy that falls in line with this is the 70 weeks of Daniel.
70 7s.
I don't believe it was by chance that Jesus told Peter to forgive your Brother 70 ×7
This would be in line with the time line of the beginning of Daniel's prophecy to the time spoken of by Luke.
( these are the days of vengeance or judgment.) Ch 21 I believe.


Christ is King
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: J Staton] #8418650
06/12/25 07:01 PM
06/12/25 07:01 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
Originally Posted by J Staton
The first coming would be mentioned in John1:1.

John 1:1 tells us that Jesus pre existed everything. But I was speaking about the first time he appeared as a man. Scholars tell us that the angel of God mentioned a few times in the Old Testament was actually Jesus appearing as a man.
Now, there are historical writings that indicate strange miracles and Jesus appearing during the Jewish war of 70 AD. That's not concrete evidence that it's true but there's no reason to rule it out, either. Of course it also doesn't mean there won't be a future return.


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: PAskinner] #8418855
06/12/25 11:49 PM
06/12/25 11:49 PM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
Originally Posted by PAskinner
Originally Posted by J Staton
The first coming would be mentioned in John1:1.

John 1:1 tells us that Jesus pre existed everything. But I was speaking about the first time he appeared as a man. Scholars tell us that the angel of God mentioned a few times in the Old Testament was actually Jesus appearing as a man.
Now, there are historical writings that indicate strange miracles and Jesus appearing during the Jewish war of 70 AD. That's not concrete evidence that it's true but there's no reason to rule it out, either. Of course it also doesn't mean there won't be a future return.

Skinner , are you speaking of instances like the Lord coming to Abraham before the distruction of Sadom.
Or
maybe when he appeared to Joshua by the river Jordan as a Man with a sword.
Or maybe even as early as Adam and Eve heard the lord walking in the cool of the day in the Garden.


Christ is King
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8418890
06/13/25 01:27 AM
06/13/25 01:27 AM
Joined: Mar 2007
michigan, usa
W
wildlifeartist1 Offline
trapper
wildlifeartist1  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Mar 2007
michigan, usa
they don't even know who wrote what we have now and call the bible and it took 1500 years
god has to be the worst communicator.. he? wrote it on grass and skins no problem there
as copies got old just make a new copy by hand oops i missed a few lines a paragraph
a chapter .. is that ( a we or a them ) i can't make it out just guess, thousands of
clerical errors, we do not have the original anymore. so what did really say?

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: wildlifeartist1] #8418916
06/13/25 06:41 AM
06/13/25 06:41 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Eastern Shore of Maryland
HobbieTrapper Offline
"Chippendale Trapper"
HobbieTrapper  Offline
"Chippendale Trapper"

Joined: Dec 2008
Eastern Shore of Maryland
Originally Posted by wildlifeartist1
Wow how misinformed
check the facts the real truth not what some preacher said
we didn't even have what we call the bible till the 4th century
what did the world do before that
if one part is made up why can't it all be.
judges 15
samson went out and caught (three hundred fox), tied their tails
together in pairs and lashed a torch between each pair of tails
to spread fire in the philistine's crops
yeah, sure he did.
how long would it take to catch 300 fox
probably have to have pens to put them in and feed and water too.
is this a true story



Where does it say he did that all at once?


-Goofy
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: wildlifeartist1] #8418925
06/13/25 07:19 AM
06/13/25 07:19 AM
Joined: Feb 2020
Indiana
P
Providence Farm Offline
trapper
Providence Farm  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Feb 2020
Indiana
Originally Posted by wildlifeartist1
they don't even know who wrote what we have now and call the bible and it took 1500 years
god has to be the worst communicator.. he? wrote it on grass and skins no problem there
as copies got old just make a new copy by hand oops i missed a few lines a paragraph
a chapter .. is that ( a we or a them ) i can't make it out just guess, thousands of
clerical errors, we do not have the original anymore. so what did really say?



You seem to miss It's GOD your speaking of. Creator if everything. If he wants his word preserved it will be. If he wants a whale to come up and give you transportation and you be alive when you get there you will be and it will. If he wants 300 foxes to be used to start a fire they likely walked right up and wanted to get the fire fastened to them

When the LORD wants something done it will be done. Often it will be unbelievable and against all odds and it's by design to leave zero doubt it was God's hand.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Giant Sage] #8418926
06/13/25 07:38 AM
06/13/25 07:38 AM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
Originally Posted by Giant Sage
Originally Posted by PAskinner
[quote=J Staton]The first coming would be mentioned in John1:1.
John 1:1 tells us that Jesus pre existed everything. But I was speaking about the first time he appeared as a man. Scholars tell us that the angel of God mentioned a few times in the Old Testament was actually Jesus appearing as a man.
Now, there are historical writings that indicate strange miracles and Jesus appearing during the Jewish war of 70 AD. That's not concrete evidence that it's true but there's no reason to rule it out, either. Of course it also doesn't mean there won't be a future return.
Skinner , are you speaking of instances like the Lord coming to Abraham before the distruction of Sadom.
Or
maybe when he appeared to Joshua by the river Jordan as a Man with a sword.
Or maybe even as early as Adam and Eve heard the lord walking in the cool of the day in the Garden.




Yes. I'm not sure about the garden of Eden...never really thought about that being Jesus, but of course, why wouldn't it be? He appeared to Abraham as a man to re affirm the promise of a son, too.


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: wildlifeartist1] #8418927
06/13/25 07:40 AM
06/13/25 07:40 AM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
Originally Posted by wildlifeartist1
they don't even know who wrote what we have now and call the bible and it took 1500 years
god has to be the worst communicator.. he? wrote it on grass and skins no problem there
as copies got old just make a new copy by hand oops i missed a few lines a paragraph
a chapter .. is that ( a we or a them ) i can't make it out just guess, thousands of
clerical errors, we do not have the original anymore. so what did really say?

There's no significant differences between the writings from the dead sea scrolls and the ones that made it in the Bible. Those clerical errors are irrelevant, because the theology remains intact.


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8418928
06/13/25 07:41 AM
06/13/25 07:41 AM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
When people scoff at the miracles , just remember, they believe in just one miracle but it's a whopper. They believe everything came from nothing for no reason.


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8418957
06/13/25 09:35 AM
06/13/25 09:35 AM
Joined: Jul 2024
IL
NorthwesternYote Offline
trapper
NorthwesternYote  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jul 2024
IL
Originally Posted by Husky
Nero was anti Christ, but he was not THE Anti-Christ. The Bible says that when he is revealed the whole world will know.

In numerology, there is a practice called gematria where Hebrew letters are assigned numeric values and then the values of words can be calculated from the letters. The Hebrew for Nero Caesar is calculated as 666.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8418980
06/13/25 10:49 AM
06/13/25 10:49 AM
Joined: Dec 2024
AR
J
J Staton Offline
trapper
J Staton  Offline
trapper
J

Joined: Dec 2024
AR
If Nero was the Antichrist who were the two witnesses he slew that were resurrected three and a half days later?

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: J Staton] #8418986
06/13/25 11:02 AM
06/13/25 11:02 AM
Joined: Jul 2024
IL
NorthwesternYote Offline
trapper
NorthwesternYote  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jul 2024
IL
Originally Posted by J Staton
If Nero was the Antichrist who were the two witnesses he slew that were resurrected three and a half days later?

I don't know. Revelation is steeped in symbolism which leads to a multitude of interpretations. A guess would be Saints Peter and Paul, who were martyred in Rome during Nero's reign.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8418992
06/13/25 11:08 AM
06/13/25 11:08 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
T
Trapper7 Offline
trapper
Trapper7  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
There are numerous proofs that Jesus existed from the beginning. Gen. 1:26, "Lets US make make man in Our image, according to OUR likeness".
Col. 1:16, "For by him all things were created both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities, all things have been created by Him and for Him." 2:9 "For in Him all the fulness of Deity dwells in bodily form." These are more that refer to his deity.


The first bottles of Coca Cola contained 3.5 grams of cocaine. That's how our grandparents were able to walk to school uphill both ways in the snow.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Giant Sage] #8418999
06/13/25 11:35 AM
06/13/25 11:35 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
T
Trapper7 Offline
trapper
Trapper7  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
Originally Posted by Giant Sage
Originally Posted by Trapper7
GS, Jesus and Paul are referring to his return in combination to the other things. If it was that present generation he was referring to, when did Jesus return? The only group I know of that say Jesus has already returned are the Jehovah Witnesses.

T7
I believe Jesus speaking to an audience that understood old testament judgment language. .
Hears a few..
Lev 16:2 Ezekial 30:3 joel2:2 Zephiniah 1:15 (comes in clouds)
Isaiah 13:10. 34:4. Ez 32:7-8 Jer4:27-28 darkness, stars falling.
Apocalyptic type language.

GS, there are so many opinions on what some of these things mean. My take on it is that right or wrong, it has no consequences on salvation which is the most important issue. I'm putting all my marbles on Jesus and his redeeming blood to save me. Without that I have no hope, I am lost. You, me, and a lot of us on here are on the same team. Our differences really don't matter because of the goal.


The first bottles of Coca Cola contained 3.5 grams of cocaine. That's how our grandparents were able to walk to school uphill both ways in the snow.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: loosegoose] #8419025
06/13/25 12:33 PM
06/13/25 12:33 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
AR
P
Preacherman Les Offline
trapper
Preacherman Les  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Dec 2006
AR
Originally Posted by loosegoose
Even most secular historians agree that Jesus was a real person that lived in Israel about 2000 years ago. What they disagree on is whether or not he was the Son of God that performed miracles and died and came back to life.



Yes. C. S. Lewis summed it up very well with his "3 L's" -either he was Lord, Liar, or Lunatic. You get to decide your opinion, but you're opinion doesn't change who or what he was. Choose carefully.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Trapper7] #8419047
06/13/25 01:29 PM
06/13/25 01:29 PM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
T7 I fully agree with you on the importance of the gospel.
And your last post.
I don't have any issues with others eschatological beliefs.
We are created with free will and with individuality.
I consider you a brother in Christ.


Christ is King
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8419318
06/14/25 12:14 AM
06/14/25 12:14 AM
Joined: Mar 2007
michigan, usa
W
wildlifeartist1 Offline
trapper
wildlifeartist1  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Mar 2007
michigan, usa
free will is ..not free if I still believed that would be hard one justify
if the message is so important why make it so hard to understand and so often misinterpreted
life doesn't have to be eternal to matter

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: wildlifeartist1] #8419340
06/14/25 05:35 AM
06/14/25 05:35 AM
Joined: Jul 2024
IL
NorthwesternYote Offline
trapper
NorthwesternYote  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jul 2024
IL
Originally Posted by wildlifeartist1
free will is ..not free if I still believed that would be hard one justify
if the message is so important why make it so hard to understand and so often misinterpreted
life doesn't have to be eternal to matter


I don't agree that it's hard to understand. God commanded the first man not to eat the forbidden fruit. It's a pretty simple instruction.

Jesus distilled his teaching into two commandments (the first called the Great Commandment). They are pretty simple commandments.

The problem is that man has a brain that he can use to rationalize anything that he wants to do.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: NorthwesternYote] #8419358
06/14/25 07:42 AM
06/14/25 07:42 AM
Joined: May 2016
Southern Illinois
F
Foxpaw Offline
trapper
Foxpaw  Offline
trapper
F

Joined: May 2016
Southern Illinois
Originally Posted by NorthwesternYote
Originally Posted by J Staton
If Nero was the Antichrist who were the two witnesses he slew that were resurrected three and a half days later?

I don't know. Revelation is steeped in symbolism which leads to a multitude of interpretations. A guess would be Saints Peter and Paul, who were martyred in Rome during Nero's reign.


The spirit of the antichrist is here but the antichrist himself will be from a Jewish line. Otherwise the Jews would not follow him. Some think the antichrist might be from the tribe of Dan. Since they were labeled as a snake and won't be in the 144,000.

With replacement theology I guess you can just make it up as you go. The Jehovah witnesses think two of their people were killed and left in the street in 1914.

Elijah and Enoch seems reasonable to me as they never died. You can't enter Heaven without dying and that will be their time to die.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: wildlifeartist1] #8419365
06/14/25 08:15 AM
06/14/25 08:15 AM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
Originally Posted by wildlifeartist1
free will is ..not free if I still believed that would be hard one justify
if the message is so important why make it so hard to understand and so often misinterpreted
life doesn't have to be eternal to matter


You have the freewill to not believe, and you have the freewill to interpret scripture any way you please.
As far as understanding that's part of freewill I believe. But if you choose to not believe. Then the spirit will not teach you. Therefore not giving you understanding.
I can't speak for others, but when I turned from trying to understand and rely on my own wisdom and turned it over to God this is when a light came on. I wish I could explain it better than that.
I guess in a nutshell, understanding comes from faith. And we have the liberty to believe or not believe.


Christ is King
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Giant Sage] #8419366
06/14/25 08:17 AM
06/14/25 08:17 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
T
TreedaBlackdog Offline
trapper
TreedaBlackdog  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
Originally Posted by Giant Sage
T7 I fully agree with you on the importance of the gospel.
And your last post.
I don't have any issues with others eschatological beliefs.
We are created with free will and with individuality.
I consider you a brother in Christ.


Trapper7 - Your last post as well very much summed up my beliefs and I agree with Giant Sage. I really enjoy when men can get into Gods Word and analyze it and learn as we sharpen one another. I admit, the more I read, the more the Holy Spirit reveals to me and can reveal different lessons at different times. Gods Word is inerrant and yes we may not always agree on every scripture and I am just fine with that.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8419368
06/14/25 08:21 AM
06/14/25 08:21 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
T
TreedaBlackdog Offline
trapper
TreedaBlackdog  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
Giant Sage - Proverbs 3:5-6 is what comes to mind.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: TreedaBlackdog] #8419377
06/14/25 09:10 AM
06/14/25 09:10 AM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
Originally Posted by TreedaBlackdog
Giant Sage - Proverbs 3:5-6 is what comes to mind.

Yes and verses 4 and 7 also.

Last edited by Giant Sage; 06/14/25 09:11 AM. Reason: Spelling

Christ is King
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8419458
06/14/25 12:03 PM
06/14/25 12:03 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
michigan, usa
W
wildlifeartist1 Offline
trapper
wildlifeartist1  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Mar 2007
michigan, usa
you do know the earliest fragment we have for the
number of the beast is 616, hope that doesn't mess it up for anyone
it's just one of those many copy problems
i feel bad for all the moves and tattoo people that got it wrong

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: wildlifeartist1] #8419464
06/14/25 12:13 PM
06/14/25 12:13 PM
Joined: Jul 2024
IL
NorthwesternYote Offline
trapper
NorthwesternYote  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jul 2024
IL
Originally Posted by wildlifeartist1
you do know the earliest fragment we have for the
number of the beast is 616, hope that doesn't mess it up for anyone
it's just one of those many copy problems
i feel bad for all the moves and tattoo people that got it wrong


It's Nero either way. The Greek version of the name Nron Qsr yields 666 and the Latin version of the name Nro Qsr yields 616.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_the_beast#Nero

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8419467
06/14/25 12:22 PM
06/14/25 12:22 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
michigan, usa
W
wildlifeartist1 Offline
trapper
wildlifeartist1  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Mar 2007
michigan, usa
and on free will.. give your children the same free will as god gives ,with the same out come
love /believe me or i will burn you for ever over and over again
just doesn't have that loving feeling and what's really bad is you're the one doing the burning!
and this is the best the all-knowing creator came up with that should give you the ick
great for back then if you were king love /worship me and you can live or I'll kill you
sounds the same

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: wildlifeartist1] #8419485
06/14/25 01:12 PM
06/14/25 01:12 PM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
Originally Posted by wildlifeartist1
and on free will.. give your children the same free will as god gives ,with the same out come
love /believe me or i will burn you for ever over and over again
just doesn't have that loving feeling and what's really bad is you're the one doing the burning!
and this is the best the all-knowing creator came up with that should give you the ick
great for back then if you were king love /worship me and you can live or I'll kill you
sounds the same


I understand your arguments, this is a fairly common argument.
As far as the type of judgment you are speaking of. It is a matter of interpretation.
Eternal punishment is not the only interpretation.
Children of course should be given free will as they become responsible so they can grow.
I personally don't understand what scripture is saying about the results on judgment day for those that are not in the book of life. I would lean more towards eternal separation or ever utterly destroyed.
I have a hard time seeing an eternal firey judgment in God's character.
I'm not saying you are wrong or write.
If your corect then it probably doesn't effect eternity. If your wrong?


Christ is King
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: wildlifeartist1] #8419491
06/14/25 01:34 PM
06/14/25 01:34 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
Originally Posted by wildlifeartist1
and on free will.. give your children the same free will as god gives ,with the same out come
love /believe me or i will burn you for ever over and over again
just doesn't have that loving feeling and what's really bad is you're the one doing the burning!
and this is the best the all-knowing creator came up with that should give you the ick
great for back then if you were king love /worship me and you can live or I'll kill you
sounds the same


This is reaction from anger, which doesn't lead to understanding. God actually desires our love a lot more than we desire him. The Creator of a billion worlds wants to invite you and me to have the same kind of conversation with him as the members of the Trinity have with each other. It sounds too good to be true but that's the biblical message, not repent or burn. But yeah, even many believers don't get it, understandably. Everything that is good in life comes from God's hand, even the things that we pervert, the good in them is his. Take that all away and how can you be anywhere but in torment? Some of us feel like we've already been through hades on earth, but we still always have something good here, some reason for hope. Anyway, if you take your questions to him honestly, they will be answered. Might take time and effort, but he's faithful, because he desires to be known.


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Page 1 of 12 1 2 3 11 12
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread